<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Information Superhighwayman &#187; Ponderings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://superhighwayman.com/category/ponderings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://superhighwayman.com</link>
	<description>I am small and I don’t eat much...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 18:40:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Emperor&#8217;s New Currency</title>
		<link>http://superhighwayman.com/2011/08/07/the-emperors-new-currency/</link>
		<comments>http://superhighwayman.com/2011/08/07/the-emperors-new-currency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 18:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Groupthink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masturbation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narrative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponderings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superhighwayman.com/?p=126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two seemingly unrelated events decided to correlate themselves in my head today and I thought I would ponder out loud just for the irony value. Firstly there was a seemingly throwaway comment that made me smile on What The Papers Say about the fact that Obama lost thousands of his Twitter followers: &#8220;Talk about hitting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two seemingly unrelated events decided to correlate themselves in my head today and I thought I would ponder out loud just for the irony value.</p>
<p>Firstly there was a seemingly throwaway comment that made me smile on What The Papers Say about the fact that Obama lost thousands of his Twitter followers: &#8220;Talk about hitting the President where it will hurt him the least&#8221;.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s one of the 1st times I have heard somebody in the media actually admit that a whole bunch of virtual Twitter followers are utterly meaningless &#8211; it&#8217;s almost a brave statement from a journalist who relies on people reading his stuff. But does anyone really care about the drivel people post on Twitter? I&#8217;ll leave that conclusion to you.</p>
<p>The other thing I noticed today was that Firefox was using nearly 4GB of memory on my Laptop. That is more crap stored in my working memory than we had long term disk space for the entire University of Leeds in the 1980&#8242;s &#8211; And I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s like we really stored much less useful data.</p>
<p>I wonder how much storage space, air-conditioning, manufacturing, working-electricity etc is being used simply to keep the gazillions of gigabytes of disk farms going just so the worthless opinions about Lady Gaga and Amy Winehouse of a billion Internet users can be preserved for ever more.</p>
<p>I shall shut up now, and not add any more to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superhighwayman.com/2011/08/07/the-emperors-new-currency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three Rs for the Modern Age</title>
		<link>http://superhighwayman.com/2010/07/16/three-rs-for-the-modern-age/</link>
		<comments>http://superhighwayman.com/2010/07/16/three-rs-for-the-modern-age/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Groupthink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponderings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superhighwayman.com/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is going to seem a rather odd post; given that I am the creator of one of the most successful Freecycle groups in the world &#8211; But I am a little annoyed to see that this year even more money is being dragged from me in the form of taxes to fund recycling schemes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is going to seem a rather odd post; given that I am the creator of one of the most successful Freecycle groups in the world &#8211; But I am a little annoyed to see that this year even more money is being dragged from me in the form of taxes to fund recycling schemes that frankly, do more harm than good.</p>
<p>I have always made a point in any interviews I give about Freecycle to never talk about landfill. The carefully crafted and commercially sponsored messages we get from Freecycle-Central in the USA are always about the evils of landfill and how the ultimate purpose of Freecycle is to keep things out of landfill sites; but I don&#8217;t agree with this. Not at all.</p>
<p>Freecycle for me isn&#8217;t about landfill or recycling it is about reuse and it is about helping people in the local community by making sure items are reused. To me, reuse schemes like Freecycle are actually about avoiding the evils of recycling, and in this sense I will do everything damned well possible to keep yet another thing out of one of those green, purple, blue, orange or polka-dot mauve bins. If you ever ask me my opinion (and oddly, people do); I will tell you that unless the item is made of aluminium or copper then just bin it. Send it to landfill, wave it on its way and thank any gods you may have that you saved the environment just a little bit more harm.</p>
<p>Recycling on a domestic level is pointless. Not only is it pointless, it is harmful and for some ridiculous reason, we are being forced to pay taxes to help this nonsense perpetuate. So why does it exist and why are Governments across Europe and North America starting to require more legislation to force us to recycle? The answer is sadly quite simple, there is a hell of a lot of money in Recycling and the people who are making all this money have damned good lobbyists.</p>
<p>Back when the world was somewhat more sensible we had three Rs. Reduce, Reuse and Recycle. Why have we forgotten all the rest and got so hung up on the last one? Well lessee…</p>
<p>Reduce:</p>
<p>Reduction is the simple answer to most things but asking a modern Western family to reduce the amount of stuff it consumes is somewhat akin to teaching pigs to sing. It won&#8217;t get you anywhere and it will only annoy them. In this modern age we tend to be rather into convenience and convenience isn&#8217;t very compatible with reduction. There is a tendency to shift the blame from us to the companies who sell us stuff and in order to shift this collective guilt people will start to blame the Supermarkets and the manufacturers for their obsession with packaging. Surely, it is the packaging that is to blame and not us! We&#8217;d be just as happy with our stuff wrapped in old newspaper or in a recycled cardboard box.</p>
<p>Nice idea but that&#8217;s just not true. Packaging isn&#8217;t cheap. Companies don&#8217;t go out of their way to spend too much money on the stuff when they could avoid it. Packaging is there for a reason, it stops items breaking and in the case of food, it stops food going off. Studies consistently show that the gains from packaging far outweigh the losses and over the last few years advances in designs have led to a lot less of it being used.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a whole other argument about &#8220;Junk food&#8221; and processed food over home cooking. Fast food chains benefit from bulk packaging and the fact that they are only running a room full of cookers to generate a whole lot of cooked food does have its plusses. As for processed foods, well contrary to what we are endlessly told there is very little waste at all from the processed food industry. The food we as humans get lasts longer and stores better and the byproducts go towards animal foods. I don&#8217;t want to make this an argument about animal welfare, that&#8217;s a completely different issue (and I really do hate to defend the modern chicken processing industry in any way at all, really I do) but it is worth noting that in reduction terms, modern commercial processing of 1,000 chickens recycles just under a metric tonne of byproducts and only uses just under 8kg of packaging.</p>
<p>Does a modern family need to use all the stuff it has? Do those low income people on their council estates really need two cars? Well in most places in Britain that aren&#8217;t in one of the few cities the answer to the car issue is probably yes. Cars are not cheap, buying the thing, fuelling it, taxing, MOT-ing and insuring it cost a small fortune these days. There seems to be some middle-class Daily Mail reading view that the evil working classes have multiple cars through choice &#8211; Maybe if the money we spent on recycling schemes went onto public transport instead… But I am getting ahead of myself here.</p>
<p>Reuse:</p>
<p>Reuse is obvious a biggie for me &#8211; Personally, I don&#8217;t like waste. If I can find a use for an old plastic bottle then I will use it and carry on re-using it. I have some juice jars here that I have been using for milk now for over 2 years &#8211; They are wonderful, far better than anything I could buy at a supermarket and they were free. I love car-boot sales and yard sales, I love thrift stores. I am not at all ashamed of driving down the street screaming &#8220;Oooh! Other people&#8217;s crap!&#8221; as I stop at yet another yard sale.</p>
<p>I picked up on Freecycle very early on for this reason; it was a near perfect scheme in that one person&#8217;s junk is another person&#8217;s gold and more to the point, the whole thing is local so there are no major logistics in transportation involved. It also made sense. I have found myself with perfectly usable things that I didn&#8217;t want any more that I know somebody else would probably love but I didn&#8217;t have a means to tell them. Freecycle answered this beautifully. It keeps useful items from being pointlessly destroyed, it saves people money because they don&#8217;t have to buy something new and it helps people who can&#8217;t afford new things enormously.</p>
<p>Nobody forces anybody to use Freecycle; there is no government legislation in fact there is no government or commercial backing at all in the UK. It is, in fact, very hard to get anyone in government interested at all since they are obsessed with Recycling schemes.</p>
<p>Of course, not everybody is on Freecycle; very few people have ever heard of Freecycle but it doesn&#8217;t stop people reusing things. Some families still recycle clothes and pass larger items around but this doesn&#8217;t seem to happen as much these days which are where local schemes can be wonderfully useful when they exist. In the past it could well be argued that certainly in Britain, Charity Shops filled this niche. People would donate stuff they no longer wanted to one of the local shops and they would sell them cheaply to the local community and make a small profit at the same time. Unfortunately it seems to be the case with what a few exceptions (thank you Salvation Army, for example for letting me have at least ONE exception), charity shops have changed. These days the used goods they sell are generally more expensive than new items you get a Primark, TK-Maxx or Poundland and their book prices are becoming astronomical. Clothing that is deigned &#8220;unfit for sale&#8221; is sent off to be pulped and that tends to be anything without a designer-label that won&#8217;t sell for their increasingly large prices. Something has gone horribly wrong in the world of the Charity Shop so I guess now, we need to praise the fact that Freecycle and Car Boot Sales exist to feed local reuse needs.</p>
<p>Recycling:</p>
<p>And now&#8230; The biggie. Third on the list for a reason and that is because it is the least important by far and yet it is the one that is given extraordinary amounts of attention and obsession and huge amounts of state funding wherever you look.</p>
<p>Why? Simple. Recycling is easy!</p>
<p>When our Daily Mail readers pack the kids to school with the bottles of pop, their packaged snacks and the like, they are safe in the knowledge that this is ok because all the packaging will be recycled. It&#8217;s far easier to buy a bottle of pop than it is to mix some squash in a reusable bottle. Who has time for that? By the same notion, it is far easier to throw those items away into a recycling bin than to maybe think that they could be used again, or given to somebody else who may use them. After all, they&#8217;ll be recycled and made into a new ones just like the TV ads say! It&#8217;s not like it&#8217;s really going to waste is it. By recycling things, people are safely protected from having to think about reduction and reuse. They are doing their bit still.</p>
<p>Sadly, it is true that recycling is both easy and guilt free. It is positively encouraged and indeed, legislated for now. Houses have an increasing number of different bins that they sort their rubbish into and off it all goes, saved from landfill and everybody is happy.</p>
<p>Not only that &#8211; We can buy more and more recycled stuff too! Notepads made of recycled paper, recycled Christmas Cards, hell there is even recycled toilet paper. This stuff is all made out of pulped clothing and recycled paper so there was no waste, no damage to the rainforests and we can feel great.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame it&#8217;s not true.</p>
<p>There is very little good in recycling on a domestic level. I don&#8217;t want to go into enormous amounts of facts and figures, search the Internet for something like the Eight Great Myths of Recycling (or just look at <a href="http://www.perc.org/articles/article179.php">http://www.perc.org/articles/article179.php</a> ) if you want them. The point is, we are not running out of sand and we are certainly not running out of paper. When sand shortages start to become an issue then yes, maybe we should worry about recycling bottles but until then, why bother? As for paper that&#8217;s a whole big hornet&#8217;s nest.</p>
<p>Recycling paper has a big negative effect on the environment. Think about that for a moment, it&#8217;s important. It is bad on so many levels &#8211; Let&#8217;s take a simplistic look.</p>
<ul>
<li>The amount of fuel being used to pick up used paper on a local level is enormous. Those trucks give out pollution you know. That&#8217;s CO2.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Once the paper is at a depots, it needs to be sorted. This involves machines, which again give out pollution and use electricity. Oh yea&#8230; More CO2.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>The paper is dirty, and needs cleaning. Sure you may not mind your recycled papers being a bit brown but the old dyes still need to be washed out and most large users still want white paper so there is going to be an industrial sized bleaching operation going on here. Waste&#8230; More waste, and more and more CO2 being pumped into the environment.</li>
</ul>
<p>You know what helps CO2? Trees. And you know what paper is made out of? Trees. Not slow growing, unreplenishable rainforest trees, the cost of getting those trees would be enormous and those are far more often used in furniture (which can be reused remember, paper generally can&#8217;t!). The trees used for making paper come from large areas of concentrated fast growing sustainable forest. Forest that helps enormously with the whole global warming deal that people are so concerned about. The process of turning these trees into paper is large-scale but localised, and whilst it does obvious use some resources to harvest and process, it is a small tiny fraction of the ones used in the recycling process. The more we recycle paper, the more CO2 we are putting into the environment that isn&#8217;t being replenished and the more trees are not being planted in sustainable forests. You know what that means? Recycling paper is polluting the earth with its by-products, killing us slowly with its CO2 emissions and it is actually reducing the amount of forest we have on the planet.</p>
<p>So what about glass? Again the resources used in localised transport of glass from houses, sorting it, crushing is and reusing it far far outweigh the resources in making new glass from sand. Sand isn&#8217;t something we are running out of in a hurry; really, it&#8217;s not.</p>
<p>Plastics are a contentious issue in this. There is no argument that making new plastic uses oil and there is a positive effect to recycling some plastics; the problem again is in the selection and sorting process which tends to still use more resources overall than not recycling. I remember a scheme a few years ago that was looking into basically melting down every sort of plastic and re-processing it to re-produce oil. This would almost certainly be a good thing but we haven&#8217;t got there yet and the folks who understand the economics of this claim that burying all the plastics we have in landfill for now, and mining it later would be far more efficient than the picky and mostly wasteful recycling we do now.</p>
<p>In doing a little bit of research for this post I did read quite a few opinions on everything and a lot of the anti-recycling articles I have seen state things like: &#8220;Recycling things like paper, aluminium cans, etc. are among the most harmful ways to pollute the environment and use fossil fuels.&#8221; &#8211; This is a shame because the person who wrote this is talking nonsense. Actually, aluminium cans are one of the few things that are very much viable to recycle, along with copper and other large metal items in general. It is easy to take the negative effect of paper and bottles and stretch this to everything and if you do bother to read &#8220;Eight Great Myths&#8221;, for example, you should pick up the fact that the big evil is the small scale house to house recycling and not much larger selective schemes which can sometimes, be positive. Scrap metals, tyres and fast-food company cooking oils are all good examples of positive recycling.</p>
<p>Landfill is often cited as the main great evils of our green age. Freecycle almost has this whole thing about keeping things out of landfill as a mantra. Companies make a LOT of money out of recycling and there are a hell of a lot of commercial pressures to keep up these myths. There isn&#8217;t a lot of money in landfill so it tends to lose the PR battle. But is landfill really so evil?</p>
<p>Actually no. Not at all &#8211; And this is one of the reason I refuse to go on about keeping things out of landfill. Modern landfills have moved on in technology; if you don&#8217;t believe me look some up! They tend to be huge centralised places that are landscaped over when they are finished; they don&#8217;t cause pollution, they are well managed and the more modern ones are re-using the methane produced by organic waste to generate electricity. Landfill sites are certainly not the great open fly infested visions of hell that recycling evangelists would have us believe &#8211; Quite the opposite in fact. A lot of them are also being designed now with the prospects of future recycling being taken into consideration. One day we may come up with a much more efficient use of plastics and when we do, we know exactly where they are in the landfill sites and we can easily get at them in bulk. When you stop and think about it, that&#8217;s actually pretty cool.</p>
<p>Ultimately there are people on both sides of this debate and it&#8217;s one I try not to get too involved with. I am forced (legally!) to recycle things and it grates at me every time I have to put used paper into a recycling bin. I hate it, but it&#8217;s happening anyway. I can&#8217;t stop people doing this, I can only hope that at some point governments will stop listening to the companies who make billions from recycling schemes that are both pointless and damaging and will come up with some other schemes. Meanwhile, I will carry on pushing for local reuse schemes like Freecycle and its offshoots and supporting yard sales and car boot sales. I will also carry on supporting the Salvation Army shops who have so far refused to forget their purpose as cheap local-community charity shops and companies like Frenchys in Atlantic Canada who keep millions of tonnes of clothing from otherwise being pulped to make recycled bloody paper!</p>
<p>So should you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superhighwayman.com/2010/07/16/three-rs-for-the-modern-age/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doctor Steaming Pile of Turd</title>
		<link>http://superhighwayman.com/2010/06/30/doctor-steaming-pile-of-turd/</link>
		<comments>http://superhighwayman.com/2010/06/30/doctor-steaming-pile-of-turd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 02:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Groupthink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponderings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superhighwayman.phatic.org/?p=111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has finally happened. The gnomes on the Internet and I agree on something; namely that the last two Doctor Who episodes (The Pandorica Opens and Big Bang) were one of the biggest pile of steaming turdburgers ever created for television. Despite having legions of Pepperpot-Daleks, Cybermen, limp-wristed Romulans, Rhino Creatures, Flying Cubes, Stonehenge, Magical [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has finally happened. The gnomes on the Internet and I agree on something; namely that the last two Doctor Who episodes (The Pandorica Opens and Big Bang) were one of the biggest pile of steaming turdburgers ever created for television. Despite having legions of Pepperpot-Daleks, Cybermen, limp-wristed Romulans, Rhino Creatures, Flying Cubes, Stonehenge, Magical Time Travelling Bracelets, an exploding Tardis and probably hundreds more things that I missed; Steven Moffat, one of British TV’s best writers, managed to write something that was ludicrous, pointless, confusing and utterly boring in more or less equal measures. Come on Steven. You wrote Press Gang and Coupling. Even Chalk had a few good moments. What’s happened?</p>
<p><a href="http://superhighwayman.com/files/2010/06/spot.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-112" title="Steaming Pile of Turd" src="http://superhighwayman.com/files/2010/06/spot.jpg" alt="The Death of Doctor Who" width="431" height="292" /></a></p>
<p>Now the Internet Gnomes are mostly teenagers who have very little concept of what Doctor Who used to be so I can forgive them for expecting low standards. They’ll acknowledge that there was a show before the 2005 pantomime remake but they probably haven’t actually watched any episoses. I mean hell it’s been going nearly 50 years now, that’s a lot to watch and fuck man! Some of them are in Black and White; didn’t people know how to encode AVIs properly in those days? Having said that, even the most die-hard fans of the new drivel will have trouble justifying a reason to look forward to the Christmas episode except maybe in the vague hope that the Doctor will finally die. We have hope yet! Remember Lynda Day? That’s all I have to say!</p>
<p>It’s not even that I don’t like Matt Smith as The Doctor; I do. I would go as far as saying that he’s pretty similar to Tom Baker in many ways and I’d class that as a compliment. With some good writing, he&#8217;d be great. For one single moment in Big Bang I had hope. He said something like “Do you really think the life of one girl is more important than the future of everything?” – Hell no! That’s the Doctor we know and love! Welcome back Hartnell and Troughton. Halleluiah! Finally us humans are back to being nothing much better than shaved apes. Unfortunately, it seems he was only joking; a brief moment of teasing taunting fantasy for those of us who remember a proper Doctor. Obviously the life of one human girl is more important than the whole of &#8230; Well whatever the fuck was going on.</p>
<p>It’s a terrible ending to a terrible show. Russell T. “If you can’t write it Camp, it’s not worth writing” Davies started it by dragging in his old mate David Tennant. Now Tennant isn’t a bad actor as such but he’s no Doctor Who. The whole thing is akin to getting Daniel “Harry Potter” Radcliffe to play James Bond. Talking of Harry Potter, what’s with all the new gadgets? Time travelling wristbands, notepads that show magical identity badges, every flavour jelly-beans, telephones that cross time and space and a Sonic Screwdriver that doubles as a magic wand when it is waved and the spell “deus ex machina” is muttered. One of the major plot-devices about Doctor Who was that a lot was unexplained but the pantomime version seems obsessive about explaining everything. There was an amusing part in the Matt Smith series when one of the ever-present C-List British TV celebrities they roll in said “Oh you are that Doctor”. Yep, he is indeed just that Doctor.</p>
<p>Back in the olden days of Doctor Who the format was pretty solid. Each story was 4 or 5 parts, with a cliff-hanger between the middle episodes and with the exception of John Pertwee’s exile years, they were very rarely set on Earth. It’s tempting to use this entry to have a dig at Americans and say that the new one hour neatly wrapped shows are made for export to the US where attention spans are shorter but this doesn’t really fly. American television is getting a lot more sophisticated than this these days and it seems to be the British who are falling well behind by adopting this somewhat tedious format. As for the writing – Well yea, all I can say is that even the old Tannith Lee episodes were better than any since Tennant became The Doctor. There were a few good Eccleston episodes but then we had false hopes once, for a short time.</p>
<p>Another thing I am curious about is why, when there is the whole of time and space to zip around in; does The Doctor insist on coming back to Earth. More specifically, Britain – In fact more specifically again, London or Wales in the early 21<sup>st</sup> Century. It’s not like the BBC is short of money for this series; each episode must cost more to make than than one of the older whole seasons. The whole thing seems kind of akin to Star Trek or Blakes 7 spending their entire time travelling back in time to 20<sup>th</sup> Century Earth.  And what’s with his obsession with Human assistants? I don’t want weedy and somewhat useless British girls, I want half naked primitive girls, in skimpy leather loincloths who carry big knives and gut the baddies when nobody is watching. I’d say I want metal dogs with guns in their nose too; but I don’t. I can live without that. The show has two spinoffs; Torchwood and The Sarah Jane Adventures – Let them deal with Earth in the 20<sup>th</sup> Century since that’s where they are set. It’s boring&#8230; Ok! I want Robots of Death, I want Yetis in space, I want Daleks on Sarko, I want The Doctor shagging green aliens. On second thoughts no; I have seen Casanova, I am not sure I want to see any more Russell T Davis sex-scenes.</p>
<p>I WANT SPACEMEN – IN SPACE AND IN THE FUTURE &#8211; DAMMIT!</p>
<p>(Oh, and I want Lynda Day back please.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superhighwayman.com/2010/06/30/doctor-steaming-pile-of-turd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How not to fire your Security Manager.</title>
		<link>http://superhighwayman.com/2010/05/20/how-not-to-fire-your-security-manager/</link>
		<comments>http://superhighwayman.com/2010/05/20/how-not-to-fire-your-security-manager/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 17:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Groupthink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponderings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superhighwayman.com/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have ever read my resume on this site you will notice that I passingly refer to being sacked from British Telecom three times. Occasionally people ask for the story of this, but since I was always covered by some weird ethical code / Non Disclosure Agreement and the like I have always kept [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have ever read my resume on this site you will notice that I passingly refer to being sacked from British Telecom three times. Occasionally people ask for the story of this, but since I was always covered by some weird ethical code / Non Disclosure Agreement and the like I have always kept quiet. It is now more than ten years since the final event so I feel it is a good time to tell the story &#8211; Mostly because it sadly amusing to see how one of the largest telecoms companies in the world could be quite so stupid. Part of the problem with writing this is that I don&#8217;t actually believe it myself. This may come across as a little bitter &#8211; It should do, because I am. I don&#8217;t think I come out too badly in this story so I am not too worried about telling it.</p>
<p>Firstly I must say that if I am being completely truthful I was only actually fired once, and this is about that event. The other two times I left it was a mutually agreed situation &#8211; In the first one, I told my managers that I flat out refused to lie for them any more and apparently in a company who&#8217;s whole culture is based on lying to customers that is a bad thing &#8211; In the second case, I left because accounting every half  hour I worked to a customer cost-centre (when it often made no sense at all) was just ludicrous and often downright dishonest. In both cases, as soon as I left my contract was immediately picked up by another part of BT  with promises of various changes and a decent pay rise.  I actually ended up with what was effectively a long unbroken lump of employment for BT, even though I worked for a few different divisions.</p>
<p>So let us go back to a time just before the last Millennium. I had just returned from a few months secondment building a new Internet Service Provider for BT&#8217;s new mobile company (Genie, now O2) and I had in my hand a glowing letter from the Chairman of Cellnet saying how wonderful me and my team were for delivering the impossible in such a short timescale. We did good on that job, even though I didn&#8217;t want to do it. Back at the office I was finally at the point of being part of the sign-off process for any solutions that BT sold to customers. In theory, before any solution was sold I got to security evaluate it first and could refuse to sign it off and send it back for design corrections if it failed. I was also working with internal security and in all I should have been happy; but I wasn&#8217;t. In the past I had been able to do what I wanted and what was best for BT and its customers as a whole &#8211; To be proactive and to look for problems that needed solving. Now I wasn&#8217;t allowed to breath without it being charged to a customer. Any autonomy I once had was gone and I was fixing things on my own time and not being paid for them which was getting somewhat ridiculous. I told my managers I was really not renewing my contract when it came up and I thought that was that.</p>
<p>A week before I was due to leave I got a call from BT Operations begging me to come and work for them. They piled on the sweeteners; a nice big pay rise, all my billing to a single cost centre, just two months and no more and I could move back to my favourite office. I agreed to this, I decided not to go ahead with another job I&#8217;d planned to move to and I made sure the paperwork was all sorted out.</p>
<p>The following Monday, I turned up at my new job and had a tea. The office was basically a football-pitch sized machine room that took up a whole floor of a building with just me and 2 operators in it. There were a few offices in there from the days that this was the major PSS centre for the UK but they had basically been abandoned Marie-Celeste like in the 80&#8242;s. I had worked here before when I worked on Genie and had made a little cubby-hole in a long since abandoned conference room, the two Operators had also moved in there.</p>
<p>At mid-day both the Ops got a call and vanished. I never saw them again. Nobody had told me what they wanted me to do so I just sat around drinking tea and watched machines humming. At 3pm I got a call from my new boss saying he was coming around at 4pm for a meeting. At about this point I attempted to login to the Operations Systems and it wouldn&#8217;t let me so I got a little suspicious and phoned some people. Nobody was saying much but somebody said they had heard that word from the board said they were about to fire me, but nobody knew why. I couldn&#8217;t find out any more so I sat and waited. My boss arrived at 4pm, and curtly told me I had been fired and he had to escort me out of the building. I asked why, he said he didn&#8217;t know, he&#8217;d just been told to do it. He asked for my security card which I didn&#8217;t have on me that day and that was that &#8211; I was standing outside the heavily armoured and razor-wired front gate and very confused.</p>
<p>The next day I expected to hear more. I didn&#8217;t &#8211; At least, I didn&#8217;t hear anything from my bosses but I did hear a lot from other parts of BT. I received mails asking me to review secure networks, I had calls from customers asking me how to repair things and I had calls from various people within BT wanting advice. I made excuses when I had to and just waited to hear something official.</p>
<p>A week went by. I heard nothing. No letter, not even an email. Nothing to tell me formally I had been sacked and nothing to tell me why. I contacted S-Com, my agency who were cagey (rightly so since they owed me a month&#8217;s salary in notice period). I am assuming they knew nothing and were keeping quiet hoping I wouldn&#8217;t notice that I was out of a job. I decided to contact a few people in BT and had a few shady meetings in pubs and BT canteens but the upshot was that nobody knew a thing. Nobody had been told I had been sacked, most people were astonished and assumed I was still working ther,  I still had my fixed network connection into BT from my house and I could still access all of their systems except for one I had been deleted from and my mail addresses all still worked.</p>
<p>I decided to arrange a meeting with BT Internal Security, I was curious to know if they knew anything so I popped to Milton Keynes for dinner and we had a chat. They&#8217;d not heard a thing and even when they dug around they could find nothing. As far as they were concerned I was still working for BT. I asked them if I could see how much access I still had without them arresting me and they said sure as long as I wasn&#8217;t silly or naughty.</p>
<p>Over the next month I tested various networks. I could access all of the customers I ever worked on which included governments, law enforcement, most of the major banks, various ISPs and a whole load of internal things. I tested my card and my ability to just walk into a building &#8211; Nobody ever challenged me, I had a nice cup of tea in the room that housed the central Bank Clearing System and the national salary payment systems (CHAPS) and yes, I could still login to them. I could also wander into Telehouse and the like at any time I wanted. I was still getting many calls from customers and internal BT people and in the end I just pointed them at somebody else and didn&#8217;t explain why.</p>
<p>At this point, I was thoroughly pissed off. BT owed me nearly £10,000 and my agency S-Com (who had sent me a crate of champagne just 2 months earlier) claimed they knew nothing about it. I sent them a copy of the purchase order and the reference numbers but they just refused to reply after that. Nobody seemed to have a clue why I was fired they just know I was. There were various rumours but none of them really seemed right. It had just been ordered from on-high.</p>
<p>So we have one exceptionally disgruntled ex-security manager, who was owed money, who was being constantly ignored and treated like shit by BT and who still had access to every customer, internal system and building of importance. I had to change my phone number after six months, people were still calling me about things. It took them two years to disconnect my lines from my house into BT and to this day there may still be personal  machines of mine housed on the internal networks that I can access. As far as I know, my card was never disabled and as far as I know, nobody in BT and certainly no customers were ever told I had stopped working there. My email address eventually stopped working in about 2004 when they changed systems.</p>
<p>To my credit, I never did anything to them &#8211; But that&#8217;s not really the point, I could have caused untold amounts of hugely embarrassing damage. I am not sure if relying on the continuing ethics of somebody you treat dismally is really a good policy but apparently in this instance it worked for them.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s at times like this I remember the old mantra:</p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #ff0000;">&#8220;WE ARE THE TELEPHONE COMPANY. WE DON&#8217;T GIVE A FUCK&#8221;.</span></h2>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superhighwayman.com/2010/05/20/how-not-to-fire-your-security-manager/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Curious Case of Canadian Marmite.</title>
		<link>http://superhighwayman.com/2010/03/30/the-curious-case-of-canadian-marmite/</link>
		<comments>http://superhighwayman.com/2010/03/30/the-curious-case-of-canadian-marmite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nothing in particular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponderings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.uknet.com/blog/michael/2010/03/30/the-curious-case-of-canadian-marmite/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As many of you may know, I am something of a Marmite addict. If you don&#8217;t know what Marmite is there are plenty of references on the Internet and if you are an Antipodean who is already looking for the comment box so you can tell me that Vegemite is better than Marmite then don&#8217;t, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As many of you may know, I am something of a Marmite addict. If you don&#8217;t know what Marmite is there are plenty of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marmite" target="_BLANK">references on the Internet</a> and if you are an Antipodean who is already looking for the comment box so you can tell me that Vegemite is better than Marmite then don&#8217;t, I am not talking about Australian Marmite which is completely different than British Marmite so the chances are high that you have never actually tasted proper Marmite otherwise you wouldn&#8217;t be talking such nonsense.</p>
<p>Anyway, all that aside, I had been convinced that the Marmite you can buy in Canada, although it is made by the same company and in the same packaging is watered down. It&#8217;s the wrong colour for a start. Canadian Marmite looks like diarrhoea and doesn&#8217;t have the translucent inner glow of British Marmite. I thought I was going mad, why would there be a difference? Tonight, I came across some old packages of British Marmite I had nicked from a hotel in Norwich in 2003 so I finally had a comparison.</p>
<p>Firstly&#8230; Hotel packets of British Marmite:</p>
<p><img src="http://lorry.org/Weblog/20100330-marmite/marmite0.jpg" alt="British Marmite" /></p>
<p>(Yes, I know the sell-by date is 2005, we will ignore that. It&#8217;s not like Marmite changes over time).</p>
<p>Now Canadian Marmite:</p>
<p><img src="http://lorry.org/Weblog/20100330-marmite/marmite1.jpg" alt="Canadian Marmite" /></p>
<p>(You can tell it&#8217;s Canadian, it has English and French labels, so no cheating here).</p>
<p>Now some anaemic toast:</p>
<p><img src="http://lorry.org/Weblog/20100330-marmite/marmite2.jpg" alt="Anaemic Toast" /></p>
<p>(Yeach, do people really eat toast this colour?)</p>
<p>And now, the Marmite on a knife:</p>
<p><img src="http://lorry.org/Weblog/20100330-marmite/marmite3.jpg" alt="British vs. Canadian Marmite" /></p>
<p>I may as well have stopped here really &#8211; It&#8217;s obvious that they are completely different. In the interests of Science, however&#8230;</p>
<p>The Marmite on toast:</p>
<p><img src="http://lorry.org/Weblog/20100330-marmite/marmite4.jpg" alt="British Marmite" /></p>
<p>I have no idea WHY Canadian Marmite is so completely different. It costs pretty much the same in Canada as it does in Britain. It doesn&#8217;t taste bad, it&#8217;s just a little weaker and you have to spread a lot more; plus there is that whole bodily fluid thing going on with it. People who may claim that the 2003 Marmite is blacker because it is old, well you will just have to trust me. I could have used the British Champagne Marmite which is just as black but that wouldn&#8217;t have been like-for-like.</p>
<p>There is no conclusion to this. I just figured that rather than waste a posting ranting about Google I may as well expose this curious Marmite Conspiracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superhighwayman.com/2010/03/30/the-curious-case-of-canadian-marmite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let&#8217;s Face it&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://superhighwayman.com/2009/11/13/lets-face-it/</link>
		<comments>http://superhighwayman.com/2009/11/13/lets-face-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narrative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nothing in particular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponderings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Rare Good Thing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.uknet.com/blog/michael/2009/11/13/lets-face-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was going to be nice to Google today. Really, I was &#8211; I started out thinking &#8220;Wow, for the first time ever, I will have to write a weblog entry and be 100% nice about Google&#8221; &#8211; As the 5 people who read my weblog will know, this isn&#8217;t normal. I don&#8217;t like Google, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to be nice to Google today. Really, I was &#8211; I started out thinking &#8220;Wow, for the first time ever, I will have to write a weblog entry and be 100% nice about Google&#8221; &#8211; As the 5 people who read my weblog will know, this isn&#8217;t normal. I don&#8217;t like Google, I make no secret of it generally but sometimes, there is the rare good thing.</p>
<p>So let&#8217;s pretend for a moment that Google isn&#8217;t a great encompassing blob of an alien life form and it is in fact different organisations some of which I can be nice about and let&#8217;s ponder Picasa.</p>
<p>I have been using Picasa from the start &#8211; I don&#8217;t know why, it&#8217;s not very popular to use Picasa, especially for somebody who doesn&#8217;t like Google. I should probably be using Flickr or Deviantart like all the cool kids do but I like Picasa desktop and I like the way it talks to Picasa Web Albums and I like the way Picasa Web Albums are nice and easy to use. But there is more.</p>
<p>Firstly, my Picasa crashed a few weeks ago. I was not happy, I use my Picasa a lot on my laptop for trying to keep tabs on what photos I have on here that I haven&#8217;t moved to the Desktop and the huge photo archive I have. Every time I loaded it, it crashed and told me to send a crash report &#8211; As long as I didn&#8217;t hit &#8220;OK&#8221; it would carry on working so that was good but I submitted a crash report anyway.  I wasn&#8217;t expecting anything, I submit Microsoft crash reports on a weekly basis and have never had any feedback at all but apparently the Picasa team actually read theirs. and a nice chap called Fernando Corrado asked me to test a new version which promptly crashed too. Eventually after 2 days of trying new versions and tweaking things the Picasa people discovered I had a screwed up installation of Quicktime that was causing some previews to die and created a fix. My Picasa now works properly again and it is nice to see such a quick response for what is really, free software.</p>
<p>Anyway, armed with a working Picasa and being generally impressed so far with the new face recognition, I decided to let Picasa run riot over my desktop.  I started it about 48 hours ago now and it claims to be 14% of the way through recognising faces (which is odd because 4 hours ago I restarted it and it claimed to be 21% of the way through).</p>
<p>It is sloooowly indexing 3 terabytes of disk on a 3.5ghz Pentium and has found just under 5,100 folders full of photos. It has found over 1,500 photos of me now ranging over 25 years, some of which have me wearing glasses, funny hats and in one, a Pippi Longstocking wig and a diamond fairy tiara (Hey I get bored in Wal*Mart sometimes). Every time I look at it, it has dug up more and more obscure photos of people with terrifying accuracy and it is still going strong. It also seems quite good at sharing the facial information (via my Gmail account I assume) between my laptop and the Desktop. I am deliberately avoiding asking what Google will do with the huge amount of data I am giving it but I am pretty sure now Google could track me pretty well with its hidden spy cameras since it even recognised me in my tinfoil helmet. Damn.</p>
<p><img src="http://lorry.org/Weblog/neversafe.jpg" alt="We are no longer safe!" align="middle" /><br />
<em>(Why wouldn&#8217;t Picasa let me link that from my Picasa album? Weird)</em></p>
<p>I can&#8217;t find much wrong with it &#8211; There are some pretty useless filters in it (why would I want to find all purple photos, or all orange photos?) and some seemingly useful filters missing. One really useful thing would be for it to be able to detect naked photos  (ok, let&#8217;s call it a porn filter). There are very few good tools for detecting porn by flesh percentage and *ah hem* &#8220;body features&#8221; on Windows &#8211; Hyperdyne&#8217;s Snitch and Media Detective are the only two I can think of and they cost more than I paid for my copy of Vista. It is a feature many people need and want so go on Google, add it please?I suspect all the tools are in there, although please&#8230; It will freak me out if you start being able to identify people without faces, that is going a little too far ok?</p>
<p>And now for the downside. Don&#8217;t worry Picasa, this isn&#8217;t about you, I have nothing but praise for you today and this weblog entry would have stopped here if I hadn&#8217;t needed to register a Gizmo5 account for Jess today.</p>
<p>I merrily browsed to http://gizmo5.com only to be redirected to http://www.google.com/gizmo5/ and told:</p>
<p><strong>Gizmo5 Has Been Acquired by Google</strong><br />
<em>New user signup has been suspended and will return when we re-launch.<br />
To receive information about the re-launch please enter your email address.</em></p>
<p>This is not useful&#8230; I needed a Gizmo5 account today and now Google own it I assume that the useful &#8220;Forward to Skype&#8221; feature will end up broken since Skype are in the business of selling Skypein numbers and won&#8217;t want Google Voice numbers supplying this for free. I assume it will also create a mess because Google Voice is only available in the US and Gizmo was available everywhere. Plus of course, it&#8217;s a pain since I wanted an account today dammit! Grrrrr.</p>
<p>On the plus side, this means I didn&#8217;t have to write a Weblog entry that was full of praise for The Evil Empire.  Got to take some good out of everything I guess.</p>
<p><em>(I also wonder why WordPress wouldn&#8217;t allow me to have that last line in a paragraph by itself&#8230; This thing has a mind of its own I swear) </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superhighwayman.com/2009/11/13/lets-face-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Madness.</title>
		<link>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/08/14/madness/</link>
		<comments>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/08/14/madness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nothing in particular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponderings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.uknet.com/blog/michael/2008/08/14/madness/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not sure I can deal with the idea of Suggs being the new Captain Birds Eye.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure I can deal with the idea of Suggs being the new Captain Birds Eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/08/14/madness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I can has vegan beefburger?</title>
		<link>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/07/17/i-can-has-vegan-beefburger/</link>
		<comments>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/07/17/i-can-has-vegan-beefburger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponderings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.uknet.com/blog/michael/2008/07/17/i-can-has-vegan-beefburger/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read the most amazing article today about McDonalds admitting it was adding milk and wheat to their french fries. (Can we call them chips now please? This is an English Weblog &#8211; In fact where I come from they fry them in beef fat anyway). Admittedly, I find it a tad strange that McDs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the most amazing article today about McDonalds admitting it was <a title="Got Milk?" href="http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/38082.php" target="_blank">adding milk and wheat to their french fries.</a> (Can we call them chips now please? This is an English Weblog &#8211; In fact where I come from they fry them in beef fat anyway).</p>
<p>Admittedly, I find it a tad strange that McDs are adding such things to their chips but that&#8217;s not my problem with the article. My problem is with comments such as:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;I am vegan. I have eaten their vegetable burger with fries for many years. I will never do it again. I really hope their vegetable burgers were animal free.&#8221; </em></p>
<p>What? What fucking retarded vegan would eat at McDonalds anyway? I can understand if they were forced in there once and had to eat something to be social or because they were starving but come on, this one has eaten there &#8220;for many years&#8221; and not had the nouse to actually check with McDonalds that their stuff was animal free? This is McDonalds, not some trendy vegan restaraunt in Covent Garden.</p>
<p>Then it struck me&#8230; Half way down the article there is a quote:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Nadia Sugich, a vegan, is also suing McDonald&#8217;s. Vegans do not eat any animal products at all (vegetarians include dairy and eggs in their diet, vegans don&#8217;t). Had she known the product contained milk she would not have touched them.&#8221; </em></p>
<p>Silly me &#8211; How did I miss that? It&#8217;s just an excuse to sue somebody. Obviously these people expected a certain duty of care and dedication to their high standards of vegan care FROM A FUCKING HAMBURGER SHOP!</p>
<p>Well I am sorry and I have no issue with most vegans, but in this case I hope the courts force them to pay costs and tell them to fuck off and get a life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/07/17/i-can-has-vegan-beefburger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Please turn out the lights&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/06/18/please-turn-out-the-lights/</link>
		<comments>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/06/18/please-turn-out-the-lights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Groupthink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masturbation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narrative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponderings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.uknet.com/blog/michael/2008/06/18/please-turn-out-the-lights/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I used to consider myself something of a nationalist. Not in the jack-booted send home all the blacks and &#8220;The Empire could do no wrong&#8221; sense, but certainly in the sense that deep down I believed that as a nation, The British are generally pretty cool. Admittedly, this is somewhat hard to defend given our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to consider myself something of a nationalist. Not in the jack-booted send home all the blacks and &#8220;The Empire could do no wrong&#8221; sense, but certainly in the sense that deep down I believed that as a nation, The British are generally pretty cool. Admittedly, this is somewhat hard to defend given our history of invasion, genocide and miscellaneous rights abuses but even with all of these things against us, I would like to believe that there were at all times people in the county actively working against these things and ultimately correcting them.</p>
<p>Of all the people in the world unlikely to lose faith in Britain I would have put myself pretty high on the list; somewhere between Churchill and Thatcher maybe. So why do I want to leave? People keep asking me this so I started thinking of the reasons myself.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not been a sudden decision although the last 10 years has hurried it a lot. So let&#8217;s think of some utterly random and disordered thoughts. This will be long, it will ramble, it will be rather typical of my weblog postings. As ever, you don&#8217;t have to read it. I am not forcing you to.</p>
<p>I remember cameras being one of the first things that pissed me off. When I was being trained in Surveillance one of the things we had to do was to start to be aware of who was watching us. I learned to look for cameras; this was a mistake. In 2006 there were over 4.2 million surveillance cameras in Britain, that was one for every 14 people. There are no statistics for the current number, but it has certainly increased. A report by Privacy International says that Britain is the worst Western Democracy at protecting individual privacy, in fact, in the world the only two countries worse than Britain are Malaysia and China. The cameras and other means of surveillance are there for various reasons including the often overlooked &#8220;US Security Operations&#8221;- Yup, the US is monitoring Britain on our own soil. Of course, whilst we are at this I was stopped and searched under the prevention of terrorism act a couple of years ago for taking photographs of Menwith Hill, a US surveillance station in the North of England which used to be a Cold War listening post and now spies on Europe for US commercial means. I should point out that taking photos of this place is not hard, it is visible from miles away, it is enormous and has been growing at a vast rate since the end of the Cold War when everybody assumed it would simply be closed.</p>
<p>They are not the only cameras I have issues with. Speed cameras are now a growing parasite on our roads. These things are operated by local police forces ostensibly as a safety measure but that myth has been debunked so many times that everybody knows it&#8217;s not true at all. They don&#8217;t add any safety, research shows that they actually have a tendency to make people speed more anyway and all they do is to make the police a fortune in fines. I have heard a theory that the Speed Camera is the single largest thing which has put a barrier between the police and the people in modern Britian. They make everybody a criminal, they make a majority of people hate and distrust the police and they make people subconsciously less willing to co-operate with a police force that seems to concentrate more on getting money from motorists than actually dealing with any crime at all. Of course, the modern British police force seems to be able to get away with shooting an unarmed man 8 times with no comeback on them so maybe it is good that we don&#8217;t trust them any more.</p>
<p>So I don&#8217;t trust the police&#8230; What about the rest of the authorities who run these surveillance operations. New legislation launched under the umbrella of making us safer from terrorists (of which much more later) is now being used by local authorities to spy on the general public for absolutely non terrorist activities. This came to light when Dorset Council admitted to spending more than 2 weeks spying on a family they suspected of lying on a school application form. The new surveillance powers granted by the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 give local authorities access to things such as phone records, email information and monitor what web sites somebody is visiting as well as the right to mount on-the-ground physical surveillance against them. Needless to say, this act wasn&#8217;t ever created to allow this but what the hell, hey?</p>
<p>All of this makes the fact I do actually trust the British Security Services somewhat a moot point. I just thought since I was ranting about the misuse of such powers I&#8217;d actually carry on my fairly consistent defence of that lot. I also still have some respect for the higher judges, unfortunately this isn&#8217;t true of the lower court rabble.</p>
<p>Of course, the 2-type legal system is something else that annoys me although this has always been a problem so I can&#8217;t claim it to be any particular reason that I am leaving. We have, however, embraced the EU human rights convention and part of this is the right to a fair trial and the assumption that you are innocent until proven guilty. The British Criminal court system does operate on this assumption but the Civil Courts certainly don&#8217;t. Anybody can take somebody to Civil Court and it&#8217;s up to you to prove that you are innocent. In any case, the chances are you will end up paying a fortune in costs, win or lose.</p>
<p>The monarchy is one of the things often cited as a reason that Britain is so great. The relationship between the Crown and Government is a complicated one and much of it is governed by convention rather than actual laws. Maybe I am made more naive because I have more knowledge of how these conventions work than most but one of the things I always thought would happen when the government started to behave tyrannically and went against the will of the people in an overwhelming way (such as entering into an illegal war) was that the Crown would step in and do something about it. I would think that this is not only the right, but the very raison d&#8217;etre of the Queen. This is why we pay for them to live a life of opulence and luxury. When Blair invaded Iraq in 2003 (an act which we now know was based on lies to Parliament) an overwhelming majority of the British people opposed this blatantly illegal act and yet the Queen still allowed her seal to be used to send her armed forces to invade another country. This shouldn&#8217;t happen, this shouldn&#8217;t happen on so many levels. Of course, to add insult to injury on this matter, Tony Blair has never been taken to account for his various lies and his various crimes. He&#8217;s happily swanning around the world making a fortune on the lecture circuit without a care in the world. There are lots of groups trying to have him called to account but frankly, they seem to be pathetic and somewhat shit. If that&#8217;s all there is then he doesn&#8217;t have much to worry about at all.</p>
<p>Do I even need to talk about the fact that Parliament has now allowed the police to hold terror suspects for 42 days, without charge. The Magna Carta? The Bill of Rights? May as well just sell them all to Americans as pretty things to go into picture frames. Oh sorry, I forgot we already did that. Talking of the Magna Carta I note that the government is still trying to push ahead with its id card scheme. Europeans and Americans don&#8217;t really understand my objection to this but it&#8217;s quite important in that it does remove a very basic right given to us in the Magna Carta all those hundreds of years ago. We still have a presumption of innocence, we still have the right to be nameless and identyless in general life. If the police want to know who we are, they have to show good reason. An identity card will lose our right to anonymity, it will shift the power slightly further towards a state where we have to show our right to be here rather than the state assuming that right by default. I am ignoring the fact that as soon as we do get an identity card, the security will be cracked, the Russian Mafia will be selling fake ones for a few thousand a piece and the government will lose all the details on a train to Waterloo or post them on a DVD to somebody. We know this will happen, it&#8217;s just how these things go. I would start talking about this all being more steps towards Corpus Juris at this point but I don&#8217;t want to sound like a nutter from the UK Independence Party, I love Europe still though I am still not sure Britain should be part of it. I just have very different reasons for my beliefs than they do.</p>
<p>And now, we couldn&#8217;t avoid it could we. The climate of fear.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t kid myself that I am much more clever than the average Brit and the only advantage I can think of is that my post graduation background was in social psychology with my PhD being in controlling people. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I am as susceptible to control as anybody, I go out and buy Fox&#8217;s biscuits every time that damned panda on my TV tells me to. I am an advertisers dream; I fall for all the tricks and it&#8217;s made worse by the fact that I know it too. The thing is, I think that deep down most people know they are being manipulated and like me they don&#8217;t much care as long as it doesn&#8217;t play too much havock with their lives. Unfortunately, the latest big lies seem to be playing havock with mine, and everybody elses.</p>
<p>That odd chap Joseph Goebbels once wrote:</p>
<p><em>“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”</em></p>
<p>And so we come to The War On Terror. My government tells me that we are living in very dangerous times and that my personal rights and liberties should be forfeit little by little to help them fight it.</p>
<p>Bollocks.</p>
<p>My government tells me that this is the most dangerous time ever and my very life and existence and freedom is at stake through the threat of Terrorism.</p>
<p>Bollocks to the first bit. I will concede to the last bit &#8211; But the threat is not from Terrorists.</p>
<p>My government tells me that invading Afghanistan and Iraq is something they had to do because we are at war with Terrorists.</p>
<p>What the fuck?</p>
<p>I started to come of political awareness in the early 80&#8242;s. I am product of that time. At that time and for the next decade or so, there were lots of bombs all over Britain, planted by the IRA and paid for by the Americans. Do Americans know that as short a time ago as 1996, the IRA bombed England&#8217;s biggest skyscrapers? Do most people outside this country know that almost every day in London there were bomb scares, train, bus and tube disruptions and general upheaval because of bombs or the threat of bombs. I don&#8217;t know how many people lost their lives through IRA bombs, I don&#8217;t know how many bombs there were. The reported numbers almost certainly don&#8217;t match the reality because the government and the press rather sensibly co-operated to keep a lot of the incidents quiet so as not to give publicity to terrorists. That is how a country with a lot of experience of terrorists works, they realise that terrorism feeds off publicity and taking that away from them helps to damage its impact. Our new enemy (which apparently now has a name, it is militant Islam) has, in the last few years made what amounts to a pathetically small impact on the country in terms of actual bombs and lives lost and yet we never hear anything else! Liberties are lost every month as we do more and more to fight this new thing, Terrorism. Have I missed something here? New thing? Terrorists in Britain? Get real!</p>
<p>In the early 80&#8242;s I didn&#8217;t think we&#8217;d make it to the year 2000 and I very much doubt I was alone. We were having leaflets posted through the door of every house in the country telling us how to survive in the aftermath of a Nuclear War and it was a time when films like When The Wind Blows and Threads were able to change British public opinion on the whole nuclear warfare issue. We slowly started to realise that we probably wouldn&#8217;t survive global nuclear war but these still seemed to be a greater than 50% chance that it would happen. My government tell me that I am at greater risk now from a bunch of disorganised terrorists?</p>
<p>HA FUCKING HA!</p>
<p>The weird thing is that like Goebbels great lies, it doesn&#8217;t seem to be global. It seems to be rather restricted to Britain and the USA. Its an excuse to go to war to further commercial interests abroad, it&#8217;s an excuse to step closer to that Governmental Holy Grail, a total and legal control of the people.  The two are Hand in hand, this is a dangerous situation for us to be in and I don&#8217;t like it. This &#8220;war&#8221; is costing us hundreds of billions of pounds and although I realise it&#8217;s cliche to count this in how many hospitals we could have built with the money it is worth pointing out that Britain&#8217;s filthy hospitals and the superbug epidemic are causing far far more deaths in this country than any terrorist activity ever will.</p>
<p>The other great lie is to do with Global Warming. Don&#8217;t switch off, don&#8217;t sneer at me. I am not saying that Global Warming is a lie, it&#8217;s not. There are differences of opinion as to what is causing Global Warming and I doubt you agree with me but even so, Global Warming has become a bandwagon to impose even more taxes and controls on the people and as I have ranted about in the past; the people it is hurting most are the poor. I foresee more and more happening in the name of global warming; I foresee more and more silly laws and restrictions and less and less useful action. Global warming will be used as an excuse to sell more and more protected land to companies to exploit and sell more and more overpriced houses to people. The poor will stay in the lowland floodable areas and will end up uninsurable and like New Orleans but on a grander scale we&#8217;ll probably end up with refugees in Mainland Britain in a decade or two. Adding more and more tax to plane travel and fuel isn&#8217;t going to help this. Putting some of those billions of pounds we are spending to protect our freedom is. Global Warming is inevitable. Taxes aren&#8217;t going to stop it. Preventing it isn&#8217;t going to work. We should be doing something about it, and doing something about it now, not later. It&#8217;s a big lie. We all know this why aren&#8217;t we doing anything about it?</p>
<p>Leigh visited England from Canada a few weeks ago and said that one of the things she noticed most about this country was the press. I have to admit I had barely noticed this but now it&#8217;s been pointed out to me I see the point. I am not sure what has happened to it, it&#8217;s not a press any more it is just popularist celebrity drivel interspersed with bigoted opinion. I don&#8217;t read newspapers any more so I hadn&#8217;t really noticed. and whilst I can&#8217;t use this as a reason for leaving I can still mourn its passing.</p>
<p>The BBC still sits on the sidelines as the only party of opposition; uncomfortably though it relies on the government for funding so its subversion is probably rather less than one would hope. I view it as some sort of ineffectual superhero that still tries hard. By day, it broadcasts endless mind numbing gobshite devoted to cookery, decorating, selling all your crap to buy new crap and buying new houses &#8211; All the things we as new-age sheep seem to like. By night, it allows platform to some quite cutting satire and the occasional excellent documentary that says much the same as I am saying here only in a less self-obsessed way. The other channels generally broadcast cheap and easy to make crap and reality TV. It&#8217;s depressing really and if this is the opium of my nation then I demand a new pusher.</p>
<p>And now for the punchline. None of this is why I want to leave&#8230;</p>
<p>The country has had messes before, England and Britain have a long history and throughout it, lots of shit has happened. But as I said at the start of this post; I have always felt that behind the scenes there were competent people working to mend things. Of course, the English have a history of being quite pathetic and resistant to change, our history of revolution is pitiful; from the rather pathetic Peasants Revolt which ended with a single blow to the Civil War which simply annoyed a bunch of people before sending everything back to how it was before as soon as the leaders realised they didn&#8217;t have anything to do once they&#8217;d won. There&#8217;s no spirit left in this country any more. Nobody cares; the people aren&#8217;t stupid, they know what is happening as well as I do but they don&#8217;t seem to care any more. Even the few who do can&#8217;t do much. Armed revolution is conveniently illegal and political revolution is, as I see it, impossible. Maybe it has always been that way, maybe this is something I have missed.</p>
<p>The only useful things that the Brits have ever really done to create change is to leave. For the first couple of centuries at least I don&#8217;t think we did so badly in America. Australia looks pretty to me and I think we have done pretty well in Canada, all things considered. Maybe it will be interesting to see how the Colonies have fared instead of constantly whining about what the Motherland has become.</p>
<p>Will the last one to leave the country please turn out the lights? Global Warming, don&#8217;t you know.</p>
<p>Some links &#8211; I didn&#8217;t want them in the main text because I am odd that way:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6108496.stm" target="_blank">Britain is &#8216;surveillance society&#8217;</a></li>
<li><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4713753.stm" target="_blank"> 					Police shot Brazilian eight times</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1584808/Council-spy-cases-hit-1,000-a-month.html" target="_blank">Council Spy Cases hit 1000 a month</a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magna_carta" target="_blank">The Magna Carta</a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_of_Rights_1689" target="_blank">The Bill of Rights </a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.britsattheirbest.com/freedom/f_eu_corpus_juris.htm" target="_blank">42 Days later&#8230; </a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.britsattheirbest.com/freedom/f_eu_corpus_juris.htm" target="_blank">UKIP on Corpus Juris </a></li>
<li>The BBC&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Power_of_Nightmares" target="_blank">The Power of Nightmares</a> &#8211; You really should <a href="http://www.archive.org/details/ThePowerOfNightmares" target="_blank">watch it here</a>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/06/18/please-turn-out-the-lights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stupid is as stupid does.</title>
		<link>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/06/15/stupid-is-as-stupid-does/</link>
		<comments>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/06/15/stupid-is-as-stupid-does/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Masturbation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narrative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nothing in particular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponderings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.uknet.com/blog/michael/2008/06/15/stupid-is-as-stupid-does/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently this posting (and I guess a few of my others) are unreadable in Internet Explorer. I am afraid there&#8217;s not much I can do about this. Sorry. For a long time, a few people have been reminding me that I promised to write a posting about the top ten ways I have nearly killed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Apparently this posting (and I guess a few of my others) are unreadable in Internet Explorer. I am afraid there&#8217;s not much I can do about this. Sorry. </em></p>
<p>For a long time, a few people have been reminding me that I promised to write a posting about the top ten ways I have nearly killed myself.  I keep meaning to do this but I am easily distracted by Youtube videos, kittens and dust which makes me a very unreliable narrator.</p>
<p>On the plus side, I am congenitally stupid so I have a wealth of events to chose from; on the down side, I have a crap memory so when it comes to putting them on paper &#8211; I simply forget.</p>
<p>I was tempted to do this as a list, you know like that Letterman guy does but then I would have to rank them and that takes real thought. I am also none too happy with the concept of &#8220;nearly killed myself&#8221; since most of my more amusing (after the event) mishaps would not have involved my death. I rarely get embarrassed so dying of embarrassment would not have been an option.</p>
<p>With this in mind, changing the title to &#8220;A random babble about some of the most stupid things I have done, most of which would warrant me inclusion into the Darwin Awards&#8221; not only makes it a lot less snappy but also puts less effort onto me to come up with the goods in a concise and easy to read form.</p>
<p>Be warned, this will be a long babble so I am putting one of those click-to-read-more thingumys here now.<br />
<span id="more-76"></span></p>
<p>I started my career at the age of three when somebody put a teddy-bear I wanted on top of my wardrobe. Being resourceful I built a little tower using a bedside table as a base and scaled the thing. I did reach the teddy before the whole thing collapsed bringing me down on my rear onto a glass which then, quite cruelly decided to break and embed itself into my bum-cheeks. I still have my first scar from that one.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t remember much else over the next few years. I knocked myself out for a few minutes on the Isle of Man docks running across gang-planks, one of which had a plank of wood across it. I rode a bike off a school roof, got stuck up a very large tree, got a knife embedded in my head throwing it at a tree, blinded myself for a couple of days and had a somewhat irresponsible habit of climbing up any scaffolding I ever saw and climbing over people&#8217;s houses. Rusty drainpipes have nearly caused me death or serious injury many times. So far, so good as far as injuries go. I have a rather odd scar in my arse, I have a missing front tooth (playground incident), a fingernail that no longer grows properly after chopping the corner of a finger off (dropping a manhole on my hand whilst exploring sewers) and I sometimes have problems using one wrist (jumping from a swing boat onto a bus-shelter roof and accidentally getting my wrist caught in the ropes). Other than those and a few burns, pellet, dart and arrow holes, I was doing pretty well.</p>
<p>This all said, I don&#8217;t think I should be held responsible for anything I did before I was 18 so we&#8217;ll gloss over all of these. Of course those few years of my late teens had a couple of incidents. I was still climbing more than I should have and I still hadn&#8217;t ever heard of ropes. I still say that our poster campaign at Leeds University was the best ever though. Leeds has a long single corridor which goes around the whole main campus at level 10 and often goes over lovely long bridge routes.</p>
<p><img src="http://lorry.org/Weblog/redroute.jpg" alt="Redroute" width="465" height="311" /></p>
<p>People would often put posters for events up on the windows since it is the main route. This was great except the porters would remove the posters overnight and that was a waste. I had the idea that we should put the posters on the outside, facing inwards. Those posters were still there for months after the event had taken place. Many people would argue that this was resourceful as opposed to stupid, and I would agree.</p>
<p>A more stupid event possibly came after being thrown out of a pub when rather drunk and still needing a wee one night. In a temporally premature display of Le Parcours I decided to vault over the fence across the road.  Unfortunately that fence was a motorway bridge leading to a 40 foot drop onto Bradford&#8217;s underground ring-road. Ah well. As you can probably guess, I did manage to hang on and hopefully recovered with some dignity intact as well. That last bit, I probably made up.</p>
<p>One of the first major stupid events came in the first year of my 20&#8242;s I think. This may have been the first to actually injure me. I shall paste my write up of this one as it stands.</p>
<ul>
<pre>
<li>When I was an undergraduate, at Leeds Uni, I ended up by some weird
method working for the Organic Chemistry Unit as a research assistant,
and, because at the time I had nowhere else to live, I moved into
the Chemistry dept, with another person I discovered lived there...
There were 2 of us living in a building that looked like an old
Victorian school - Occasionally hiding from security guards.
I was a programmer working on 3D rotation of molecular structures
for the front end of a drugs design system - I knew nothing at all
about organic chemistry so I would build virtual houses out of
molecules and use them to test my software.  I was sacked in the
end for all sorts of weird things including leaving a pint of cider
inside a computer.; being drunk pretty much all the time and oddly,
writing poetry in the comments sections of all of my code - I think
4 times more comments than actual code was the general observation,
they were just heathens!

We had a few interesting night-time episodes, mostly fueled by the
fact we spent all of our time absolutely drunk and I had made master
keys for the whole building anyway during one of my more sober
periods...

One I remember was trying to light a Bunsen burner, to heat up a
pan of stew... We couldn't find a match or anything anywhere so we
filled a sink with water, put paper towels all around the sink and
floor and were chucking pieces of sodium in hoping we could catch
the paper towels alight... That was not a success... My patent moth
trap was good too... a glass tank of conc. HCL with a lamp underneath
it... The moth went down and "Poof!" no more moth.

That was all fun and games, till the one night we were in a phys.
chem lab turning coins into tinfoil ... You get a beaker of conc
nitric, and you drop a coin into it... You then fish it out with
your fingers (being careful because it gets hot) when it is about
the thickness of foil - They are really cute because the designs
on the coin actually stay so you get these really cute but stupidly
thin real coins - Oh, and brown fingers - Conc nitric isn't bad for
your fingers as such but it does stain. I think I was feeling very
strange that day and decided it would be fun to mix everything
liquid I could find with everything powdery... I asked my colleague
if it would blow up and he said probably not, so I did... I do sort
of remember the clouds of boiling hot sulphuric acid, and I do
remember coughing up tonnes of blood as I was dragged out with him
muttering something about fume cabinets and stupid twats.

Ever since then.. I have been a bit wary of anything to do with
Chemistry, and my lungs have never been terribly good since then
either. Oh and I rarely drink any more much, either... I think my
kidneys suffered those few years.</li>
</pre>
</ul>
<p>We&#8217;ll gloss over much comment on this one though, I have been told I am an idiot many times in the past so I don&#8217;t need to add more. I didn&#8217;t document many incidents at this time however, I did set my room on fire as a 1st year undergraduate and had to sleep with my hand in a bucket of water for a week because of the injuries I caused myself dragging the burning piles outside. Fire is often one of the things that causes me problems as can be seen from this little email exchange to the Wiseguys group&#8230;</p>
<ul>
<li>
<pre>
From: Michael Lawrie
Subject: Re: Aztec women versus the Ninja slime
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 92 9:19:25 BST

&gt;   &gt;my thigh, I have never had a bruise that big before! Oh well... I set
&gt;   &gt;fire to my bedroom shortly after, that wasn't my week...          ^^^
&gt;    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
&gt; I have to ask.  I HAVE to ask.

It's not that exciting really, I am used to setting fire to things 'coz me and
fire don't seem to mix. It all started when my venus fly trap finally died, I
have this theory with plants that they need a bit of adrenalin to make them grow
better, so if one fails I line the rest up and let them watch their old friend
being cremated... I poured the petrol over the fly trap and took out a Zippo,
it was empty so I had to fill it up, as is usual with zippos I managed to spill
half the petrol over my hand and arm, and dabbed it off with some tissue which I
then dropped on the floor.... Anyway, by now in a hurry to get this cremation
over, I lit the zippo, lit the plant, accidentally lit my arm, somehow managed
to light the tissue on the floor and eventually threw the whole lot into the
bin (minus the arm but plus some eyebrows and a lot of hair off the back of my
hand). This then set fire to the contents of the bin until I put the lid on,
but that didn't last long since being a plastic bin it melted the bottom. The
plant sprayer then came in useful for the 1st time ever and saved my carpet
from too much more damage, if I'd used it on the plant in the 1st place none
of this would ever have happened I doubt!

You may be thinking "What a plonker" by now, believe me, although on a larger
scale it doesn't begin to compare with the time I set my terminal on fire
because I was balancing a lit Zippo on a pork pie... But that's an even more
convoluted story!

--
Michael Lawrie, systems group.
HICOM: Communications and information for the world HCI community.

From: Michael Lawrie
Subject: pork pie. (fwd)
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 92 9:28:34 BST
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL0 (LUT)]

I'm afraid you'll get this twice now, coz I screwed up the last one, I
could have left it as it was but I guess it demands some explanation <img src='http://superhighwayman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> 

Forwarded message:
&gt;
&gt; I was sitting on Cheeseplant's house yesterday, quite happily spodding

(Cheeseplant's house, a UK talk system thing)
(Spod, to spod is to sit on talk systems or muds wasting time)

&gt; away, and filling my Zippo with petrol. Fine, as usual I wasn't really
&gt; concentrating so I poured petrol all over my hand and desk. Now I don't
&gt; like petrol on my hands so, to get it off, I lit it - Fine, it burned
&gt; off so I shook it out and must have touched the desk top. I was on the
&gt; phone to Jon too at the time and the desk set alight. I dropped the
&gt; phone, moaned a bit and put the desk fire out. I thought that was it
&gt; so I let the Zippo burning balancing on top of my pork pie to burn off
&gt; the overfill of petrol... Then someone knocked at the door so I had to
&gt; go and answer it - It was Jayce come to get me to go home, so I started
&gt; to lock up - Went into the terminal room and turned the photocopier off
&gt; but accidentally turned the wrong plug and turned Polly (one of the
&gt; VAX-Stations off instead). Screamed and ranted about this for a couple
&gt; of seconds and walked back into my office to check the network was
&gt; still ok, I walked in the door to find my keyboard was on fire in a
&gt; pretty impressive display of large yellow flames and black thick smoke.
&gt; Managed to blow this out, sulked a lot about the charred hole in my
&gt; desk where the Zippo had fallen off the pork pie and finally examined
&gt; the keyboard (which was still working funnily enough). Anyway, at this
&gt; point people noticed Polly had gone and came to hassle me about why their
&gt; edits were failing, so not only had I set fire to my desk I also had an
&gt; audience of people who wanted to go home, wanted to make sure their day's
&gt; work wasn't ruined and were witnessing the charred remains of my desk and
&gt; keyboard.
&gt;
&gt; In all, yesterday night was not the best night of my life.

--
Michael Lawrie, systems group.
HICOM: Communications and information for the world HCI community.</pre>
</li>
</ul>
<p>The next few years was relatively free of any major incidents. In Leicester, I used to cycle home drunk and asleep far too often and would often come around after having crashed into a tree or a parked car. This isn&#8217;t quite as bad as it sounds since I would only ever cycle home at about 4am when the streets were more or less deserted.</p>
<p>Diving is a relatively safe hobby these days as long as you follow the rules. Obviously, I don&#8217;t but that is another matter. I have enough self-knowledge of my own stupidity not to scuba dive to extremes and this helps. Unfortunately the same isn&#8217;t always true for Freediving. I learned to dive when I was 9; I couldn&#8217;t swim (and still can&#8217;t) but I have no fear of water so I just work out some sort of agreement with the sea where it doesn&#8217;t hassle me and I don&#8217;t mess it up with my drowned dead body. This has accidentally made me a very good freediver which is odd because the combination of not being able to swim and being shit at holding my breath would seem to be serious downsides to this ability. People ask me how long I can hold my breath; so far my answer has always been &#8220;Long enough not to be dead &#8211; So far&#8221;. I have pushed this to the limits twice now.</p>
<p>The first time was pure stupidity and pride. I was swimming around a group of trainee divers about half a kilometer off the shore and about 60ft down and I cramped. Cramping isn&#8217;t cool; when you can&#8217;t move your leg, you can&#8217;t kick and when you can&#8217;t kick you can&#8217;t swim to the surface. Oddly, I am not sure whether through inexperience with Scuba or sheer pride (I am tempted to go for the second) my first thought wasn&#8217;t just to try and head for a diver and grab their emergency breathy-thingy, my first thought was to stay attempting to look cool and drift behind the reef so that they wouldn&#8217;t see me panic and die. Of course, I did manage to get behind the reef where I could use my one good leg and arms to kick off and get to the surface. But I did learn a lot about safety that day which I pretty soon forgot.</p>
<p>A couple of years later, I was doing my Master Freediver training and doing a qualifying dive which has to be constant ballast and over 100ft. At this time a 100ft dive was a walk in the park but I still had to do it to get my certification. Freedivers are generally healthy creatures, they meditate to lower their heartrate, they avoid caffeine and alcohol and foods that are bad for you; they are masters of their own bodies. As a result, they tend to look pretty cool. Before my dive, I had managed to get 2nd degree sunburn over half my body and was on 1200mg of Ibuprofen every couple of hours, I had just gone to Wendys and had a half pound cheeseburger and chips with a pint of diet coke and I had just slipped off to a local shop to have a couple of large cups of coffee. My heartbeat was well into the hundreds and wasn&#8217;t going anywhere lower for a long time. In fairness to me, I did my 113ft qualifying dive quite well. The problem was, when I went for a deeper one afterwards. Throwing up at 100ft is not a pleasant experience and not one I would wish on anybody. Not only does it lose you all your air, it also hurts like fuck.I did make it to the surface; I also didn&#8217;t do any deep dives again ever after that and I always dive with a tiny emergency tank now. You can&#8217;t say I don&#8217;t learn my lessons the hard way.</p>
<p>Over the next few years, I have been relatively accident free I think. I blinded myself for 3 days, I accidentally shot myself and then crashed my car later when the concussion hit me, I fainted syphoning petrol with a hose pipe and purely accidentally I nearly broke my back standing on a cat on the stairs during a 5 day power cut (it was dark, the cat is evil, what can I say!). A few people have tried to kill me, mostly deliberately and mostly in an unplanned way (although one did try to electrocute me) but so far they seem to have not managed.</p>
<p>I shall stop here for now; it is 7pm and I need breakfast. Bacon, egg, eausage and chips and maybe even fried bread. I shall carry on killing myself in more conventional and tasty ways.</p>
<p>Keep breathing folks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/06/15/stupid-is-as-stupid-does/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

