<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Information Superhighwayman &#187; Observations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://superhighwayman.com/category/observations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://superhighwayman.com</link>
	<description>I am small and I don’t eat much...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 01:15:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Primary Source: Not Found</title>
		<link>http://superhighwayman.com/2012/03/24/primary-source-not-found/</link>
		<comments>http://superhighwayman.com/2012/03/24/primary-source-not-found/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 04:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Groupthink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inventions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narrative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponderings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superhighwayman.com/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As many of you may know, I have a somewhat large and extensive computer museum, a lot of which can be seen on http://ancientcomputers.com. I didn&#8217;t start collecting these because it was trendy; in fact it was the complete opposite of trendy when I started. Back in the late 80s and early 90s I seemed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As many of you may know, I have a somewhat large and extensive computer museum, a lot of which can be seen on http://ancientcomputers.com. I didn&#8217;t start collecting these because it was trendy; in fact it was the complete opposite of trendy when I started. Back in the late 80s and early 90s I seemed to be on a one-man mission to try and convince people NOT to throw this stuff away. I would try and convince universities and companies that we needed to keep machines, peripherals, data and manuals for their historical importance and that pretty soon; we&#8217;d end up regretting chucking it all away.</p>
<p>I would have the heartbreak of going to places to rescue an old piece of equipment they were scrapping and being shown a warehouse full of stuff that was about to be dumped. I didn&#8217;t have the transport or the storage space for it so I had to be very selective in what I could take.</p>
<p>The majority of my first collection was actually mostly stolen when a truck of mine was broken into. I assume all the contents were just trashed because financially, none of it was worth anything at all; people were still effectively paying to have this stuff crushed or at best, having it taken away free for the price of the gold on the circuit boards. I lost a lot of stuff that is completely irreplaceable, and just about all of the early MUD and BB history I had on various disks, tapes and paper tape.</p>
<p>These days of course, things have changed – Retro is in fashion and it seems to be pretty trendy to collect ancient computers – This has the advantage that I don&#8217;t need to any more, since I didn&#8217;t collect most of this junk because I liked it, I collected it because somebody had to and nobody else seemed to be stepping up to offer. Quite a lot of my stuff has gone to proper museums now but I still keep hold of my core collection though, mostly out of petulance and spite&#8230;</p>
<p>And so, to the subject of this post!  I read an article once that claimed that mankind lost more data in the 1970s and 1980s than at any other time in history and from my experience, this causes some unusual problems. I thought I would give two somewhat ridiculous examples that I have come across lately.</p>
<p>The first relates to the title of this article: &#8220;Primary Sources&#8221; – Wikipedia&#8217;s aim is to become an encyclopaedia of just about everything and because of its position of being the major encyclopaedia on the Internet it is generally a very good source for documenting the history of computing. A couple of years ago I decided to update an article about something of which I am one of the primary experts, having written it. It was an article on some obscure Multi User Game history. I made a few changes to the Wikipedia article and corrected some things. Apparently I was not meant to do this. Shortly afterwards I got into a discussion with an editor who was complaining that I hadn&#8217;t referenced any proper sources. I explained that I was the primary source on this matter, but apparently that didn&#8217;t matter. Had I ever given an interview on this, or written a book, it would have been fine, I could have referenced that; but it seems that I can&#8217;t just reference myself. Wikipedia&#8217;s rules say &#8220;<strong>Do not</strong> base articles and material entirely on primary sources. <strong>Do not</strong> add unsourced material from your personal experience, because that would make Wikipedia a primary source of that material.&#8221;</p>
<p>The problem is that all of this stuff happened in the late 80s and in the late 80s there was a LOT of reference material that would have been a gold-mine for Wikipedia; servers full of documentation, academic (and non-academic) papers, and the ever present and ever busy Bulletin Boards. When the World-Wide-Web came along these things didn&#8217;t migrate and as the old systems were decommissioned, the data was simply discarded and lost forever. There was no &#8220;way back machine&#8221; or Google Cache in those days and at best, some people may have their own backups on floppy disks or paper printouts. I used to have lots of these, but most are gone now. I still have some of the actual machines which probably have the data on them &#8211; but there seems little point me pulling it off if the data itself becomes an unusable Primary Source.</p>
<p>And so the problem is that there is a distinct lack of primary source material from the 1970s and 1980s. If Wikipedia really does want to document this era in which a lot of ground-breaking, fun and interesting history was actually made then they really should consider allowing Primary Sources to contribute. A lot of people who did a lot of good stuff back then, developing, using, and researching things that weren’t “invented” until decades later; but they simply aren’t self-publicists. They don’t give interviews (even if anybody had a clue that they should be interviewing them!) and they don’t write books or appear in them unless they accidentally happen to cross paths with the likes of Tracy Kidder or Katie Hafner at just the right moment. They are distinctly absent from history and the way things are, along with the data we have lost, the people will be lost too.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Another completely different problem happened a few years ago when I was trying to resurrect the first Multi User Games, Essex MUD and MIST, to run at Bletchley Park&#8217;s Computer Museum. Essex MUD ran on a DEC PDP-10 running the TOPS-10 Operating System. Being a good Systems Manager all those years ago, I backed-up everything I could think of before I finally turned the off-switch on the Essex Games. I certainly had enough so that one day, I could recover it – At least, I thought I had; and now I had to put this theory into practice.</p>
<p>The first challenge was to get hold of a PDP-10 – We thought we had one at Bletchley but it turned out to be an obscure (but very pretty) PDP-11. As far as I know there are no complete and working PDP-10s left anywhere in the world but this was less of a problem than it may have first seemed. One thing that was relatively easy to get hold of was a PDP-10 TOPS-10 simulator. I could run a completely realistic (if not slightly too speedy) simulator on another system, in this case a MicroVAX. I could have used something else, but I wanted to at least keep the whole thing on DEC machines. I got the simulator running, I loaded all the data from my various backups and I went to get the BCPL compiler to compile the source code for MUD; and this is where everything started to go wrong.</p>
<p>It seems that nobody had ever thought to keep a copy of the BCPL compiler. Why would they? It&#8217;s Systems Software. It&#8217;s not like it&#8217;s just going to vanish one day, is it? Well yes. It is, and yes. It had. I contacted Richard Bartle, who along with Roy Trubshaw originally wrote MUD1 back in the late 70s – I thought he may have a copy of the BCPL compiler somewhere and he confirmed that he may have one on an old half inch tape from 1981 ish. Half inch magnetic tape isn&#8217;t really meant to last 25 years but it was worth a try, so he sent it to me and I popped it in my tape drive to read it. And it wouldn&#8217;t. Of course, PDP-10s used a different physical 7-Track tape format than my more modern 9-Track reader could cope with. If it had been a different logical format I could have fixed that, but physical was completely out of my control.</p>
<p>Never being one to give up, I decided to put out a call to see if anyone, anywhere in the world, had a working old PDP-10 7-Track tape drive. To date, nobody has. If (and that is a big &#8220;if&#8221;) the BCPL compiler is on that tape, and it may be the only copy left anywhere in the world, then I can&#8217;t get it off. Without it, I can&#8217;t get anything else to work at all and never ever will be able to.</p>
<p>Even when I was sitting, doing a backup in 1992, knowing that one day I would probably want to recreate this stuff, I never dreamed that I would not be able to get hold of a vital compiler just 15 years later – And bear in mind that I knew more about this stuff back then than just about anybody. I was one of the only people collecting old technology and preaching the need to keep things for the future; a major part of my job was recovering data from ancient and obsolete National Health Service tapes and disks that would otherwise have been lost and I was, and still am, completely obsessive about archiving against accidental loss.</p>
<p>In a few years we may well realise that we have lost so much of the 70s and 80s that it is verging on the unbelievable. In other areas of history and modern archaeology we have finally understood the need to keep first-hand personal stories from sources such as the mill-workers and miners and the soldiers in the First and Second World Wars. One day maybe I should expect somebody to turn up at my house with a tape-recorder in an attempt to force me to try and remember stuff. With luck, they will bring tea and cakes and forgive the fact that as a somewhat senile Primary Source, I will probably be quite useless by then.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s easier to learn from history when we bother to preserve it. The arrogance of not doing so seems quite incredible to me. But what would I know? I am just another unreliable source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superhighwayman.com/2012/03/24/primary-source-not-found/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Emperor&#8217;s New Currency</title>
		<link>http://superhighwayman.com/2011/08/07/the-emperors-new-currency/</link>
		<comments>http://superhighwayman.com/2011/08/07/the-emperors-new-currency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 18:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Groupthink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masturbation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narrative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponderings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superhighwayman.com/?p=126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two seemingly unrelated events decided to correlate themselves in my head today and I thought I would ponder out loud just for the irony value. Firstly there was a seemingly throwaway comment that made me smile on What The Papers Say about the fact that Obama lost thousands of his Twitter followers: &#8220;Talk about hitting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two seemingly unrelated events decided to correlate themselves in my head today and I thought I would ponder out loud just for the irony value.</p>
<p>Firstly there was a seemingly throwaway comment that made me smile on What The Papers Say about the fact that Obama lost thousands of his Twitter followers: &#8220;Talk about hitting the President where it will hurt him the least&#8221;.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s one of the 1st times I have heard somebody in the media actually admit that a whole bunch of virtual Twitter followers are utterly meaningless &#8211; it&#8217;s almost a brave statement from a journalist who relies on people reading his stuff. But does anyone really care about the drivel people post on Twitter? I&#8217;ll leave that conclusion to you.</p>
<p>The other thing I noticed today was that Firefox was using nearly 4GB of memory on my Laptop. That is more crap stored in my working memory than we had long term disk space for the entire University of Leeds in the 1980&#8242;s &#8211; And I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s like we really stored much less useful data.</p>
<p>I wonder how much storage space, air-conditioning, manufacturing, working-electricity etc is being used simply to keep the gazillions of gigabytes of disk farms going just so the worthless opinions about Lady Gaga and Amy Winehouse of a billion Internet users can be preserved for ever more.</p>
<p>I shall shut up now, and not add any more to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superhighwayman.com/2011/08/07/the-emperors-new-currency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doctor Steaming Pile of Turd</title>
		<link>http://superhighwayman.com/2010/06/30/doctor-steaming-pile-of-turd/</link>
		<comments>http://superhighwayman.com/2010/06/30/doctor-steaming-pile-of-turd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 02:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Groupthink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponderings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superhighwayman.phatic.org/?p=111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has finally happened. The gnomes on the Internet and I agree on something; namely that the last two Doctor Who episodes (The Pandorica Opens and Big Bang) were one of the biggest pile of steaming turdburgers ever created for television. Despite having legions of Pepperpot-Daleks, Cybermen, limp-wristed Romulans, Rhino Creatures, Flying Cubes, Stonehenge, Magical [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has finally happened. The gnomes on the Internet and I agree on something; namely that the last two Doctor Who episodes (The Pandorica Opens and Big Bang) were one of the biggest pile of steaming turdburgers ever created for television. Despite having legions of Pepperpot-Daleks, Cybermen, limp-wristed Romulans, Rhino Creatures, Flying Cubes, Stonehenge, Magical Time Travelling Bracelets, an exploding Tardis and probably hundreds more things that I missed; Steven Moffat, one of British TV’s best writers, managed to write something that was ludicrous, pointless, confusing and utterly boring in more or less equal measures. Come on Steven. You wrote Press Gang and Coupling. Even Chalk had a few good moments. What’s happened?</p>
<p><a href="http://superhighwayman.com/files/2010/06/spot.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-112" title="Steaming Pile of Turd" src="http://superhighwayman.com/files/2010/06/spot.jpg" alt="The Death of Doctor Who" width="431" height="292" /></a></p>
<p>Now the Internet Gnomes are mostly teenagers who have very little concept of what Doctor Who used to be so I can forgive them for expecting low standards. They’ll acknowledge that there was a show before the 2005 pantomime remake but they probably haven’t actually watched any episoses. I mean hell it’s been going nearly 50 years now, that’s a lot to watch and fuck man! Some of them are in Black and White; didn’t people know how to encode AVIs properly in those days? Having said that, even the most die-hard fans of the new drivel will have trouble justifying a reason to look forward to the Christmas episode except maybe in the vague hope that the Doctor will finally die. We have hope yet! Remember Lynda Day? That’s all I have to say!</p>
<p>It’s not even that I don’t like Matt Smith as The Doctor; I do. I would go as far as saying that he’s pretty similar to Tom Baker in many ways and I’d class that as a compliment. With some good writing, he&#8217;d be great. For one single moment in Big Bang I had hope. He said something like “Do you really think the life of one girl is more important than the future of everything?” – Hell no! That’s the Doctor we know and love! Welcome back Hartnell and Troughton. Halleluiah! Finally us humans are back to being nothing much better than shaved apes. Unfortunately, it seems he was only joking; a brief moment of teasing taunting fantasy for those of us who remember a proper Doctor. Obviously the life of one human girl is more important than the whole of &#8230; Well whatever the fuck was going on.</p>
<p>It’s a terrible ending to a terrible show. Russell T. “If you can’t write it Camp, it’s not worth writing” Davies started it by dragging in his old mate David Tennant. Now Tennant isn’t a bad actor as such but he’s no Doctor Who. The whole thing is akin to getting Daniel “Harry Potter” Radcliffe to play James Bond. Talking of Harry Potter, what’s with all the new gadgets? Time travelling wristbands, notepads that show magical identity badges, every flavour jelly-beans, telephones that cross time and space and a Sonic Screwdriver that doubles as a magic wand when it is waved and the spell “deus ex machina” is muttered. One of the major plot-devices about Doctor Who was that a lot was unexplained but the pantomime version seems obsessive about explaining everything. There was an amusing part in the Matt Smith series when one of the ever-present C-List British TV celebrities they roll in said “Oh you are that Doctor”. Yep, he is indeed just that Doctor.</p>
<p>Back in the olden days of Doctor Who the format was pretty solid. Each story was 4 or 5 parts, with a cliff-hanger between the middle episodes and with the exception of John Pertwee’s exile years, they were very rarely set on Earth. It’s tempting to use this entry to have a dig at Americans and say that the new one hour neatly wrapped shows are made for export to the US where attention spans are shorter but this doesn’t really fly. American television is getting a lot more sophisticated than this these days and it seems to be the British who are falling well behind by adopting this somewhat tedious format. As for the writing – Well yea, all I can say is that even the old Tannith Lee episodes were better than any since Tennant became The Doctor. There were a few good Eccleston episodes but then we had false hopes once, for a short time.</p>
<p>Another thing I am curious about is why, when there is the whole of time and space to zip around in; does The Doctor insist on coming back to Earth. More specifically, Britain – In fact more specifically again, London or Wales in the early 21<sup>st</sup> Century. It’s not like the BBC is short of money for this series; each episode must cost more to make than than one of the older whole seasons. The whole thing seems kind of akin to Star Trek or Blakes 7 spending their entire time travelling back in time to 20<sup>th</sup> Century Earth.  And what’s with his obsession with Human assistants? I don’t want weedy and somewhat useless British girls, I want half naked primitive girls, in skimpy leather loincloths who carry big knives and gut the baddies when nobody is watching. I’d say I want metal dogs with guns in their nose too; but I don’t. I can live without that. The show has two spinoffs; Torchwood and The Sarah Jane Adventures – Let them deal with Earth in the 20<sup>th</sup> Century since that’s where they are set. It’s boring&#8230; Ok! I want Robots of Death, I want Yetis in space, I want Daleks on Sarko, I want The Doctor shagging green aliens. On second thoughts no; I have seen Casanova, I am not sure I want to see any more Russell T Davis sex-scenes.</p>
<p>I WANT SPACEMEN – IN SPACE AND IN THE FUTURE &#8211; DAMMIT!</p>
<p>(Oh, and I want Lynda Day back please.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superhighwayman.com/2010/06/30/doctor-steaming-pile-of-turd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let&#8217;s Face it&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://superhighwayman.com/2009/11/13/lets-face-it/</link>
		<comments>http://superhighwayman.com/2009/11/13/lets-face-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narrative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nothing in particular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponderings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Rare Good Thing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.uknet.com/blog/michael/2009/11/13/lets-face-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was going to be nice to Google today. Really, I was &#8211; I started out thinking &#8220;Wow, for the first time ever, I will have to write a weblog entry and be 100% nice about Google&#8221; &#8211; As the 5 people who read my weblog will know, this isn&#8217;t normal. I don&#8217;t like Google, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to be nice to Google today. Really, I was &#8211; I started out thinking &#8220;Wow, for the first time ever, I will have to write a weblog entry and be 100% nice about Google&#8221; &#8211; As the 5 people who read my weblog will know, this isn&#8217;t normal. I don&#8217;t like Google, I make no secret of it generally but sometimes, there is the rare good thing.</p>
<p>So let&#8217;s pretend for a moment that Google isn&#8217;t a great encompassing blob of an alien life form and it is in fact different organisations some of which I can be nice about and let&#8217;s ponder Picasa.</p>
<p>I have been using Picasa from the start &#8211; I don&#8217;t know why, it&#8217;s not very popular to use Picasa, especially for somebody who doesn&#8217;t like Google. I should probably be using Flickr or Deviantart like all the cool kids do but I like Picasa desktop and I like the way it talks to Picasa Web Albums and I like the way Picasa Web Albums are nice and easy to use. But there is more.</p>
<p>Firstly, my Picasa crashed a few weeks ago. I was not happy, I use my Picasa a lot on my laptop for trying to keep tabs on what photos I have on here that I haven&#8217;t moved to the Desktop and the huge photo archive I have. Every time I loaded it, it crashed and told me to send a crash report &#8211; As long as I didn&#8217;t hit &#8220;OK&#8221; it would carry on working so that was good but I submitted a crash report anyway.  I wasn&#8217;t expecting anything, I submit Microsoft crash reports on a weekly basis and have never had any feedback at all but apparently the Picasa team actually read theirs. and a nice chap called Fernando Corrado asked me to test a new version which promptly crashed too. Eventually after 2 days of trying new versions and tweaking things the Picasa people discovered I had a screwed up installation of Quicktime that was causing some previews to die and created a fix. My Picasa now works properly again and it is nice to see such a quick response for what is really, free software.</p>
<p>Anyway, armed with a working Picasa and being generally impressed so far with the new face recognition, I decided to let Picasa run riot over my desktop.  I started it about 48 hours ago now and it claims to be 14% of the way through recognising faces (which is odd because 4 hours ago I restarted it and it claimed to be 21% of the way through).</p>
<p>It is sloooowly indexing 3 terabytes of disk on a 3.5ghz Pentium and has found just under 5,100 folders full of photos. It has found over 1,500 photos of me now ranging over 25 years, some of which have me wearing glasses, funny hats and in one, a Pippi Longstocking wig and a diamond fairy tiara (Hey I get bored in Wal*Mart sometimes). Every time I look at it, it has dug up more and more obscure photos of people with terrifying accuracy and it is still going strong. It also seems quite good at sharing the facial information (via my Gmail account I assume) between my laptop and the Desktop. I am deliberately avoiding asking what Google will do with the huge amount of data I am giving it but I am pretty sure now Google could track me pretty well with its hidden spy cameras since it even recognised me in my tinfoil helmet. Damn.</p>
<p><img src="http://lorry.org/Weblog/neversafe.jpg" alt="We are no longer safe!" align="middle" /><br />
<em>(Why wouldn&#8217;t Picasa let me link that from my Picasa album? Weird)</em></p>
<p>I can&#8217;t find much wrong with it &#8211; There are some pretty useless filters in it (why would I want to find all purple photos, or all orange photos?) and some seemingly useful filters missing. One really useful thing would be for it to be able to detect naked photos  (ok, let&#8217;s call it a porn filter). There are very few good tools for detecting porn by flesh percentage and *ah hem* &#8220;body features&#8221; on Windows &#8211; Hyperdyne&#8217;s Snitch and Media Detective are the only two I can think of and they cost more than I paid for my copy of Vista. It is a feature many people need and want so go on Google, add it please?I suspect all the tools are in there, although please&#8230; It will freak me out if you start being able to identify people without faces, that is going a little too far ok?</p>
<p>And now for the downside. Don&#8217;t worry Picasa, this isn&#8217;t about you, I have nothing but praise for you today and this weblog entry would have stopped here if I hadn&#8217;t needed to register a Gizmo5 account for Jess today.</p>
<p>I merrily browsed to http://gizmo5.com only to be redirected to http://www.google.com/gizmo5/ and told:</p>
<p><strong>Gizmo5 Has Been Acquired by Google</strong><br />
<em>New user signup has been suspended and will return when we re-launch.<br />
To receive information about the re-launch please enter your email address.</em></p>
<p>This is not useful&#8230; I needed a Gizmo5 account today and now Google own it I assume that the useful &#8220;Forward to Skype&#8221; feature will end up broken since Skype are in the business of selling Skypein numbers and won&#8217;t want Google Voice numbers supplying this for free. I assume it will also create a mess because Google Voice is only available in the US and Gizmo was available everywhere. Plus of course, it&#8217;s a pain since I wanted an account today dammit! Grrrrr.</p>
<p>On the plus side, this means I didn&#8217;t have to write a Weblog entry that was full of praise for The Evil Empire.  Got to take some good out of everything I guess.</p>
<p><em>(I also wonder why WordPress wouldn&#8217;t allow me to have that last line in a paragraph by itself&#8230; This thing has a mind of its own I swear) </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superhighwayman.com/2009/11/13/lets-face-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>London Olympics 2012</title>
		<link>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/08/27/london-olympics-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/08/27/london-olympics-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Groupthink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nothing in particular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pageoftheday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pretty Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.uknet.com/blog/michael/2008/08/27/london-olympics-2012/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s no point me harping on about this, you know full well my assumption is that it will be a disaster best avoided. That said, I am prepared to let someone else have their say and Dave Kellett summed it up rather nicely in today&#8217;s Sheldon Comic. &#8216;Nuff said.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no point me harping on about this, you know full well my assumption is that it will be a disaster best avoided. That said, I am prepared to let someone else have their say and Dave Kellett summed it up rather nicely in today&#8217;s <a href="http://www.sheldoncomics.com/archive/080827.html" title="Sheldon Comics" target="_blank">Sheldon Comic</a>.<br />
&#8216;Nuff said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/08/27/london-olympics-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>She wont let you fly, but she might let you sing.</title>
		<link>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/08/17/she-wont-let-you-fly-but-she-might-let-you-sing/</link>
		<comments>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/08/17/she-wont-let-you-fly-but-she-might-let-you-sing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 17:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Narrative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nothing in particular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Rare Good Thing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.uknet.com/blog/michael/2008/08/17/she-wont-let-you-fly-but-she-might-let-you-sing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For once, the British Government has impressed me. It&#8217;s not much but it&#8217;s so rare I thought it worth a mention. Their new training site is called &#8220;Train to Gain&#8221; and of course, given my general despair of the world as it is today, I would have assumed they&#8217;d have named the website &#8220;train2gain.gov.uk&#8221;. But [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For once, the British Government has impressed me. It&#8217;s not much but it&#8217;s so rare I thought it worth a mention.</p>
<p>Their new training site is called &#8220;Train to Gain&#8221; and of course, given my general despair of the world as it is today, I would have assumed they&#8217;d have named the website &#8220;train2gain.gov.uk&#8221;. But no! It&#8217;s actually called &#8220;traintogain.gov.uk&#8221;.</p>
<p>Well done that department! Credit where it&#8217;s due.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/08/17/she-wont-let-you-fly-but-she-might-let-you-sing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I can has vegan beefburger?</title>
		<link>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/07/17/i-can-has-vegan-beefburger/</link>
		<comments>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/07/17/i-can-has-vegan-beefburger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponderings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.uknet.com/blog/michael/2008/07/17/i-can-has-vegan-beefburger/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read the most amazing article today about McDonalds admitting it was adding milk and wheat to their french fries. (Can we call them chips now please? This is an English Weblog &#8211; In fact where I come from they fry them in beef fat anyway). Admittedly, I find it a tad strange that McDs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the most amazing article today about McDonalds admitting it was <a title="Got Milk?" href="http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/38082.php" target="_blank">adding milk and wheat to their french fries.</a> (Can we call them chips now please? This is an English Weblog &#8211; In fact where I come from they fry them in beef fat anyway).</p>
<p>Admittedly, I find it a tad strange that McDs are adding such things to their chips but that&#8217;s not my problem with the article. My problem is with comments such as:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;I am vegan. I have eaten their vegetable burger with fries for many years. I will never do it again. I really hope their vegetable burgers were animal free.&#8221; </em></p>
<p>What? What fucking retarded vegan would eat at McDonalds anyway? I can understand if they were forced in there once and had to eat something to be social or because they were starving but come on, this one has eaten there &#8220;for many years&#8221; and not had the nouse to actually check with McDonalds that their stuff was animal free? This is McDonalds, not some trendy vegan restaraunt in Covent Garden.</p>
<p>Then it struck me&#8230; Half way down the article there is a quote:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Nadia Sugich, a vegan, is also suing McDonald&#8217;s. Vegans do not eat any animal products at all (vegetarians include dairy and eggs in their diet, vegans don&#8217;t). Had she known the product contained milk she would not have touched them.&#8221; </em></p>
<p>Silly me &#8211; How did I miss that? It&#8217;s just an excuse to sue somebody. Obviously these people expected a certain duty of care and dedication to their high standards of vegan care FROM A FUCKING HAMBURGER SHOP!</p>
<p>Well I am sorry and I have no issue with most vegans, but in this case I hope the courts force them to pay costs and tell them to fuck off and get a life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/07/17/i-can-has-vegan-beefburger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Please turn out the lights&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/06/18/please-turn-out-the-lights/</link>
		<comments>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/06/18/please-turn-out-the-lights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Groupthink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masturbation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narrative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponderings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.uknet.com/blog/michael/2008/06/18/please-turn-out-the-lights/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I used to consider myself something of a nationalist. Not in the jack-booted send home all the blacks and &#8220;The Empire could do no wrong&#8221; sense, but certainly in the sense that deep down I believed that as a nation, The British are generally pretty cool. Admittedly, this is somewhat hard to defend given our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to consider myself something of a nationalist. Not in the jack-booted send home all the blacks and &#8220;The Empire could do no wrong&#8221; sense, but certainly in the sense that deep down I believed that as a nation, The British are generally pretty cool. Admittedly, this is somewhat hard to defend given our history of invasion, genocide and miscellaneous rights abuses but even with all of these things against us, I would like to believe that there were at all times people in the county actively working against these things and ultimately correcting them.</p>
<p>Of all the people in the world unlikely to lose faith in Britain I would have put myself pretty high on the list; somewhere between Churchill and Thatcher maybe. So why do I want to leave? People keep asking me this so I started thinking of the reasons myself.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not been a sudden decision although the last 10 years has hurried it a lot. So let&#8217;s think of some utterly random and disordered thoughts. This will be long, it will ramble, it will be rather typical of my weblog postings. As ever, you don&#8217;t have to read it. I am not forcing you to.</p>
<p>I remember cameras being one of the first things that pissed me off. When I was being trained in Surveillance one of the things we had to do was to start to be aware of who was watching us. I learned to look for cameras; this was a mistake. In 2006 there were over 4.2 million surveillance cameras in Britain, that was one for every 14 people. There are no statistics for the current number, but it has certainly increased. A report by Privacy International says that Britain is the worst Western Democracy at protecting individual privacy, in fact, in the world the only two countries worse than Britain are Malaysia and China. The cameras and other means of surveillance are there for various reasons including the often overlooked &#8220;US Security Operations&#8221;- Yup, the US is monitoring Britain on our own soil. Of course, whilst we are at this I was stopped and searched under the prevention of terrorism act a couple of years ago for taking photographs of Menwith Hill, a US surveillance station in the North of England which used to be a Cold War listening post and now spies on Europe for US commercial means. I should point out that taking photos of this place is not hard, it is visible from miles away, it is enormous and has been growing at a vast rate since the end of the Cold War when everybody assumed it would simply be closed.</p>
<p>They are not the only cameras I have issues with. Speed cameras are now a growing parasite on our roads. These things are operated by local police forces ostensibly as a safety measure but that myth has been debunked so many times that everybody knows it&#8217;s not true at all. They don&#8217;t add any safety, research shows that they actually have a tendency to make people speed more anyway and all they do is to make the police a fortune in fines. I have heard a theory that the Speed Camera is the single largest thing which has put a barrier between the police and the people in modern Britian. They make everybody a criminal, they make a majority of people hate and distrust the police and they make people subconsciously less willing to co-operate with a police force that seems to concentrate more on getting money from motorists than actually dealing with any crime at all. Of course, the modern British police force seems to be able to get away with shooting an unarmed man 8 times with no comeback on them so maybe it is good that we don&#8217;t trust them any more.</p>
<p>So I don&#8217;t trust the police&#8230; What about the rest of the authorities who run these surveillance operations. New legislation launched under the umbrella of making us safer from terrorists (of which much more later) is now being used by local authorities to spy on the general public for absolutely non terrorist activities. This came to light when Dorset Council admitted to spending more than 2 weeks spying on a family they suspected of lying on a school application form. The new surveillance powers granted by the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 give local authorities access to things such as phone records, email information and monitor what web sites somebody is visiting as well as the right to mount on-the-ground physical surveillance against them. Needless to say, this act wasn&#8217;t ever created to allow this but what the hell, hey?</p>
<p>All of this makes the fact I do actually trust the British Security Services somewhat a moot point. I just thought since I was ranting about the misuse of such powers I&#8217;d actually carry on my fairly consistent defence of that lot. I also still have some respect for the higher judges, unfortunately this isn&#8217;t true of the lower court rabble.</p>
<p>Of course, the 2-type legal system is something else that annoys me although this has always been a problem so I can&#8217;t claim it to be any particular reason that I am leaving. We have, however, embraced the EU human rights convention and part of this is the right to a fair trial and the assumption that you are innocent until proven guilty. The British Criminal court system does operate on this assumption but the Civil Courts certainly don&#8217;t. Anybody can take somebody to Civil Court and it&#8217;s up to you to prove that you are innocent. In any case, the chances are you will end up paying a fortune in costs, win or lose.</p>
<p>The monarchy is one of the things often cited as a reason that Britain is so great. The relationship between the Crown and Government is a complicated one and much of it is governed by convention rather than actual laws. Maybe I am made more naive because I have more knowledge of how these conventions work than most but one of the things I always thought would happen when the government started to behave tyrannically and went against the will of the people in an overwhelming way (such as entering into an illegal war) was that the Crown would step in and do something about it. I would think that this is not only the right, but the very raison d&#8217;etre of the Queen. This is why we pay for them to live a life of opulence and luxury. When Blair invaded Iraq in 2003 (an act which we now know was based on lies to Parliament) an overwhelming majority of the British people opposed this blatantly illegal act and yet the Queen still allowed her seal to be used to send her armed forces to invade another country. This shouldn&#8217;t happen, this shouldn&#8217;t happen on so many levels. Of course, to add insult to injury on this matter, Tony Blair has never been taken to account for his various lies and his various crimes. He&#8217;s happily swanning around the world making a fortune on the lecture circuit without a care in the world. There are lots of groups trying to have him called to account but frankly, they seem to be pathetic and somewhat shit. If that&#8217;s all there is then he doesn&#8217;t have much to worry about at all.</p>
<p>Do I even need to talk about the fact that Parliament has now allowed the police to hold terror suspects for 42 days, without charge. The Magna Carta? The Bill of Rights? May as well just sell them all to Americans as pretty things to go into picture frames. Oh sorry, I forgot we already did that. Talking of the Magna Carta I note that the government is still trying to push ahead with its id card scheme. Europeans and Americans don&#8217;t really understand my objection to this but it&#8217;s quite important in that it does remove a very basic right given to us in the Magna Carta all those hundreds of years ago. We still have a presumption of innocence, we still have the right to be nameless and identyless in general life. If the police want to know who we are, they have to show good reason. An identity card will lose our right to anonymity, it will shift the power slightly further towards a state where we have to show our right to be here rather than the state assuming that right by default. I am ignoring the fact that as soon as we do get an identity card, the security will be cracked, the Russian Mafia will be selling fake ones for a few thousand a piece and the government will lose all the details on a train to Waterloo or post them on a DVD to somebody. We know this will happen, it&#8217;s just how these things go. I would start talking about this all being more steps towards Corpus Juris at this point but I don&#8217;t want to sound like a nutter from the UK Independence Party, I love Europe still though I am still not sure Britain should be part of it. I just have very different reasons for my beliefs than they do.</p>
<p>And now, we couldn&#8217;t avoid it could we. The climate of fear.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t kid myself that I am much more clever than the average Brit and the only advantage I can think of is that my post graduation background was in social psychology with my PhD being in controlling people. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I am as susceptible to control as anybody, I go out and buy Fox&#8217;s biscuits every time that damned panda on my TV tells me to. I am an advertisers dream; I fall for all the tricks and it&#8217;s made worse by the fact that I know it too. The thing is, I think that deep down most people know they are being manipulated and like me they don&#8217;t much care as long as it doesn&#8217;t play too much havock with their lives. Unfortunately, the latest big lies seem to be playing havock with mine, and everybody elses.</p>
<p>That odd chap Joseph Goebbels once wrote:</p>
<p><em>“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”</em></p>
<p>And so we come to The War On Terror. My government tells me that we are living in very dangerous times and that my personal rights and liberties should be forfeit little by little to help them fight it.</p>
<p>Bollocks.</p>
<p>My government tells me that this is the most dangerous time ever and my very life and existence and freedom is at stake through the threat of Terrorism.</p>
<p>Bollocks to the first bit. I will concede to the last bit &#8211; But the threat is not from Terrorists.</p>
<p>My government tells me that invading Afghanistan and Iraq is something they had to do because we are at war with Terrorists.</p>
<p>What the fuck?</p>
<p>I started to come of political awareness in the early 80&#8242;s. I am product of that time. At that time and for the next decade or so, there were lots of bombs all over Britain, planted by the IRA and paid for by the Americans. Do Americans know that as short a time ago as 1996, the IRA bombed England&#8217;s biggest skyscrapers? Do most people outside this country know that almost every day in London there were bomb scares, train, bus and tube disruptions and general upheaval because of bombs or the threat of bombs. I don&#8217;t know how many people lost their lives through IRA bombs, I don&#8217;t know how many bombs there were. The reported numbers almost certainly don&#8217;t match the reality because the government and the press rather sensibly co-operated to keep a lot of the incidents quiet so as not to give publicity to terrorists. That is how a country with a lot of experience of terrorists works, they realise that terrorism feeds off publicity and taking that away from them helps to damage its impact. Our new enemy (which apparently now has a name, it is militant Islam) has, in the last few years made what amounts to a pathetically small impact on the country in terms of actual bombs and lives lost and yet we never hear anything else! Liberties are lost every month as we do more and more to fight this new thing, Terrorism. Have I missed something here? New thing? Terrorists in Britain? Get real!</p>
<p>In the early 80&#8242;s I didn&#8217;t think we&#8217;d make it to the year 2000 and I very much doubt I was alone. We were having leaflets posted through the door of every house in the country telling us how to survive in the aftermath of a Nuclear War and it was a time when films like When The Wind Blows and Threads were able to change British public opinion on the whole nuclear warfare issue. We slowly started to realise that we probably wouldn&#8217;t survive global nuclear war but these still seemed to be a greater than 50% chance that it would happen. My government tell me that I am at greater risk now from a bunch of disorganised terrorists?</p>
<p>HA FUCKING HA!</p>
<p>The weird thing is that like Goebbels great lies, it doesn&#8217;t seem to be global. It seems to be rather restricted to Britain and the USA. Its an excuse to go to war to further commercial interests abroad, it&#8217;s an excuse to step closer to that Governmental Holy Grail, a total and legal control of the people.  The two are Hand in hand, this is a dangerous situation for us to be in and I don&#8217;t like it. This &#8220;war&#8221; is costing us hundreds of billions of pounds and although I realise it&#8217;s cliche to count this in how many hospitals we could have built with the money it is worth pointing out that Britain&#8217;s filthy hospitals and the superbug epidemic are causing far far more deaths in this country than any terrorist activity ever will.</p>
<p>The other great lie is to do with Global Warming. Don&#8217;t switch off, don&#8217;t sneer at me. I am not saying that Global Warming is a lie, it&#8217;s not. There are differences of opinion as to what is causing Global Warming and I doubt you agree with me but even so, Global Warming has become a bandwagon to impose even more taxes and controls on the people and as I have ranted about in the past; the people it is hurting most are the poor. I foresee more and more happening in the name of global warming; I foresee more and more silly laws and restrictions and less and less useful action. Global warming will be used as an excuse to sell more and more protected land to companies to exploit and sell more and more overpriced houses to people. The poor will stay in the lowland floodable areas and will end up uninsurable and like New Orleans but on a grander scale we&#8217;ll probably end up with refugees in Mainland Britain in a decade or two. Adding more and more tax to plane travel and fuel isn&#8217;t going to help this. Putting some of those billions of pounds we are spending to protect our freedom is. Global Warming is inevitable. Taxes aren&#8217;t going to stop it. Preventing it isn&#8217;t going to work. We should be doing something about it, and doing something about it now, not later. It&#8217;s a big lie. We all know this why aren&#8217;t we doing anything about it?</p>
<p>Leigh visited England from Canada a few weeks ago and said that one of the things she noticed most about this country was the press. I have to admit I had barely noticed this but now it&#8217;s been pointed out to me I see the point. I am not sure what has happened to it, it&#8217;s not a press any more it is just popularist celebrity drivel interspersed with bigoted opinion. I don&#8217;t read newspapers any more so I hadn&#8217;t really noticed. and whilst I can&#8217;t use this as a reason for leaving I can still mourn its passing.</p>
<p>The BBC still sits on the sidelines as the only party of opposition; uncomfortably though it relies on the government for funding so its subversion is probably rather less than one would hope. I view it as some sort of ineffectual superhero that still tries hard. By day, it broadcasts endless mind numbing gobshite devoted to cookery, decorating, selling all your crap to buy new crap and buying new houses &#8211; All the things we as new-age sheep seem to like. By night, it allows platform to some quite cutting satire and the occasional excellent documentary that says much the same as I am saying here only in a less self-obsessed way. The other channels generally broadcast cheap and easy to make crap and reality TV. It&#8217;s depressing really and if this is the opium of my nation then I demand a new pusher.</p>
<p>And now for the punchline. None of this is why I want to leave&#8230;</p>
<p>The country has had messes before, England and Britain have a long history and throughout it, lots of shit has happened. But as I said at the start of this post; I have always felt that behind the scenes there were competent people working to mend things. Of course, the English have a history of being quite pathetic and resistant to change, our history of revolution is pitiful; from the rather pathetic Peasants Revolt which ended with a single blow to the Civil War which simply annoyed a bunch of people before sending everything back to how it was before as soon as the leaders realised they didn&#8217;t have anything to do once they&#8217;d won. There&#8217;s no spirit left in this country any more. Nobody cares; the people aren&#8217;t stupid, they know what is happening as well as I do but they don&#8217;t seem to care any more. Even the few who do can&#8217;t do much. Armed revolution is conveniently illegal and political revolution is, as I see it, impossible. Maybe it has always been that way, maybe this is something I have missed.</p>
<p>The only useful things that the Brits have ever really done to create change is to leave. For the first couple of centuries at least I don&#8217;t think we did so badly in America. Australia looks pretty to me and I think we have done pretty well in Canada, all things considered. Maybe it will be interesting to see how the Colonies have fared instead of constantly whining about what the Motherland has become.</p>
<p>Will the last one to leave the country please turn out the lights? Global Warming, don&#8217;t you know.</p>
<p>Some links &#8211; I didn&#8217;t want them in the main text because I am odd that way:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6108496.stm" target="_blank">Britain is &#8216;surveillance society&#8217;</a></li>
<li><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4713753.stm" target="_blank"> 					Police shot Brazilian eight times</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1584808/Council-spy-cases-hit-1,000-a-month.html" target="_blank">Council Spy Cases hit 1000 a month</a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magna_carta" target="_blank">The Magna Carta</a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_of_Rights_1689" target="_blank">The Bill of Rights </a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.britsattheirbest.com/freedom/f_eu_corpus_juris.htm" target="_blank">42 Days later&#8230; </a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.britsattheirbest.com/freedom/f_eu_corpus_juris.htm" target="_blank">UKIP on Corpus Juris </a></li>
<li>The BBC&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Power_of_Nightmares" target="_blank">The Power of Nightmares</a> &#8211; You really should <a href="http://www.archive.org/details/ThePowerOfNightmares" target="_blank">watch it here</a>.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/06/18/please-turn-out-the-lights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mr Twit never went really hungry&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/06/10/mr-twit-never-went-really-hungry/</link>
		<comments>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/06/10/mr-twit-never-went-really-hungry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Groupthink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ponderings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.uknet.com/blog/michael/2008/06/10/mr-twit-never-went-really-hungry/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Mr Twit never went really hungry. By sticking out his tongue and curling is sideways to explore the hairy jungle around his mouth, he was always able to find a tasty morsel here and there to nibble on.&#8221; (Roald Dahl) For those of you who haven&#8217;t experienced Twitter I ask you to stop reading now. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;Mr Twit never went really hungry. By sticking out his tongue and curling is sideways to explore the hairy jungle around his mouth, he was always able to find a tasty morsel here and there to nibble on.&#8221; (Roald Dahl)<br />
</em></p>
<p>For those of you who haven&#8217;t experienced Twitter I ask you to stop reading now. I offer no definitions, no useful information and no links. You don&#8217;t need to read this posting, get on with your life and ignore it. A life without Twitter is a richer life indeed.</p>
<p>A few days ago, Leigh explained Twitter to me and made it all a little more clear to me. Some of what she said made sense, I could see some small merit in micro-blogging and as a 55-word story writer, I obviously have a sense that small can often be a lot more beautiful. I don&#8217;t object to the concept of Twitter per-se, I object to how people seem to use it. Twitter originally came into my field of annoyance because of its interface to Facebook; now unfortunately it seems to be infecting everything. Twitter updates the Facebook statuses of people so I would get a feed somewhat like this.</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;Pillock is waiting for a train.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;Pillock has been waiting for 5 minutes, the train is now late.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;Pillock wonders where the train is, and goes to get coffee.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;Pillock thinks the coffee is horrible but at least the train is coming soon.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;Pillock finally sees the train.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;Pillock is getting on the train now.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;Pillock doesn&#8217;t seem to be able to get a seat, damn train company.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<p>I will stop now&#8230; Unfortunately, this endless microglimpse into somebody&#8217;s tedious existence won&#8217;t. So why do people do it? I could probably come up with all sorts of theories; some of which would be pretty sound but ultimately it all boils down to the fact they do it because they are obviously quite deranged. Is anybody interested in this? Isn&#8217;t there enough quality literature in the world for people to read without them sitting there all day reading this constant stream of dirge? Apparently you can get people&#8217;s Twitter feeds sent to your mobile phone &#8211; What the fuck? WHY?</p>
<p>Maybe part of the problem is that it seems to be acceptable in the modern work place to be connected to garbage like this. When I was at BT, it used to be a particular bugbear of one of our security people that if people got into work and sat down and read the newspaper for the first 4 hours, they&#8217;d probably be sacked but that people seemed to think it was quite acceptable to sit reading random stuff on the Interwebs all day, playing on Facebook and the like. Is it a way that office people can escape work that is more acceptable than sitting in the garden reading Treasure Island? I pity what society will become if it is. On that matter, I find it somewhat ironic that I used to effectively twitter for a living. People used to have to pay $3.00 for each of my 140 word messages but then they were sad wankers, with no other friends than the imaginary people at the other end of their phone. Oh&#8230; Wait a minute&#8230; Ummm.</p>
<p>Maybe it is part of the new instant news society. As news consumers we seem to expect second by second updates but they aren&#8217;t useful, they aren&#8217;t healthy and they often do nothing more than confuse the whole situation. The average person isn&#8217;t trained as an intelligence analyst and the average person&#8217;s mind isn&#8217;t quite that fucked up enough to want to be. Nicholas Taleb writes quite well on the subject of the psychological effect of constant streams of updated information in his book <a href="http://www.fooledbyrandomness.com/" title="Fooled by Randomness" target="_blank">&#8220;Fooled by randomness&#8221;</a> &#8211; If you can ever drag yourself away from reading inane twitter messages, weblog postings and RSS feeds full of online comics; I suggest you give it a read.</p>
<p>A few of the armies of the world still employ War Artists; Australia and Britian being two of the key ones. The theory is that a painting can take in all the events of a day, of a battle, of a campaign and merge them all into one single, well thought out visual statement. It can do this far better than a single photograph, a single video clip, a single report. Whilst I don&#8217;t argue that very occasionally a potographer or film cameraman does capture an iconic image of war; I do agree with history that the painting does it far better. What&#8217;s wrong with people noting their thoughts down in a little notepad, a camera or an electronic organiser and summarising their day later? They could even use Twitter to do it and write something like &#8220;Late Trian, Crap Coffee, No Seat &#8211; But Long John Silver whisked me away and saved me. Thanks Robert.&#8221;</p>
<p>I quite like <a href="http://giolla.livejournal.com/" title="Giolla's Livejournal" target="_blank">Giolla&#8217;s Livejournal</a>. He occasionally posts a small Haiku that summarises his week which seems like a perfect use for Twitter &#8211; Maybe people could learn a lesson from that but they won&#8217;t will they. They will continue to think that people are interested in every breath they take. Sting was wrong. We aren&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/06/10/mr-twit-never-went-really-hungry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The inglorious 12th.</title>
		<link>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/05/12/the-inglorious-12th/</link>
		<comments>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/05/12/the-inglorious-12th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 07:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Narrative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pretty Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.uknet.com/blog/michael/2008/05/12/the-inglorious-12th/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The pheasant situation is starting to become silly. For those of you lucky enough not to have heard me rant in person; we seem to have a whole colony of pheasants living in the garden. I have nothing against pheasants when they are timid little things that fly away when you approach them &#8211; In [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pheasant situation is starting to become silly. For those of you lucky enough not to have heard me rant in person; we seem to have a whole colony of pheasants living in the garden. I have nothing against pheasants when they are timid little things that fly away when you approach them &#8211; In fact, I think pheasants are very pretty birds generally deserving of not being shot. These ones, on the other hand, are starting to get just a little too comfortable.</p>
<p>For a start, they scare the cats. My cats are not easily scared, they bring me rats, squirrels, small wolves&#8230; But the pheasants just completely ignore them, in fact a few days ago, I caught Poggin inside the house, looking out of the patio doors looking oddly uncomfortable. I followed her gaze and there was a huge fat pheasant standing face against the glass, staring back at her and me.  He didn&#8217;t go away; in fact when I later returned with a camera, I swear he posed.</p>
<p>The other problem is the noise! Pheasants are noisy little fuckers. As I am typing this, at the opposite side of a large house, all I can hear is that bloody bird squawking about something or other. I suspect the something or other is the fact I haven&#8217;t put food out for them. I shall go and check&#8230;</p>
<p>Um, no, apparently the squawking was actually squeaking, and it was Tink torturing a mouse. Now I have to deal with that too. I went out to try and record you pheasant noises but I got sidetracked taking pictures of the manhole full of poo.</p>
<p>Anyway, this post was just an excuse to procrastinate a little and to post some pheasant photos, so here you are:</p>
<p><img src="http://lorry.org/Weblog/20080512-pheasants/20080512-pheasant-01.jpg" alt="Harassing Poggin 1" height="499" width="579" /></p>
<p>And if you want the rest, then click on the little &#8220;Read more&#8221; thingumy.<span id="more-69"></span></p>
<p><img src="http://lorry.org/Weblog/20080512-pheasants/20080512-pheasant-02.jpg" alt="More Poggin harassment" height="385" width="587" /></p>
<p><img src="http://lorry.org/Weblog/20080512-pheasants/20080512-pheasant-03.jpg" alt="Mrs Pheasant" height="546" width="486" /></p>
<p><img src="http://lorry.org/Weblog/20080512-pheasants/20080512-pheasant-04.jpg" alt="The Skinnier Mr Pheasant" height="404" width="499" /></p>
<p><img src="http://lorry.org/Weblog/20080512-pheasants/20080512-pheasant-05.jpg" alt="Fatter Mr Pheasant 1" height="402" width="531" /></p>
<p><img src="http://lorry.org/Weblog/20080512-pheasants/20080512-pheasant-06.jpg" alt="Fatter Mr Pheasant 2" height="402" width="531" /></p>
<p><img src="http://lorry.org/Weblog/20080512-pheasants/20080512-pheasant-07.jpg" alt="Thinner Mr Pheasant 1" height="556" width="549" /></p>
<p><img src="http://lorry.org/Weblog/20080512-pheasants/20080512-pheasant-08.jpg" alt="Thinner Mr Pheasant 2" height="561" width="488" /></p>
<p><img src="http://lorry.org/Weblog/20080512-pheasants/20080512-pheasant-09.jpg" alt="Thinner Mr Pheasant 3" height="492" width="608" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superhighwayman.com/2008/05/12/the-inglorious-12th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

